How do magnets work?(coolmagnetman.com)
coolmagnetman.com
How do magnets work?
http://www.coolmagnetman.com/maghow.htm
7 comments
I would refine your explanation a bit--you were 90% there but you got the direction of the magnetic force wrong, and the way I learned it involved special relativity. So when you are sitting on an electron in one wire and you see the protons zipping backwards in the other wire and the electrons twice as fast as that, the phenomenon of "length contraction" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_contraction) occurs because all these particles are moving close to the speed of light. Since from your reference frame the electrons are moving faster than the protons, they are length contracted to a greater degree, so they appear to have a higher charge density than the protons. Therefore the repulsive electric force between your electron and the charge density of the electrons is greater than the attractive force between your electron and the charge density of the protons, so your electron is repelled (and we observe this as the magnetic force).
Laughable ASCII diagram (just note that within each wire, the opposite charges are intermingled, not separated like shown):
Laughable ASCII diagram (just note that within each wire, the opposite charges are intermingled, not separated like shown):
Lab reference frame Reference frame of e- on wire 1
V
- - - - - - - ==> - - - - -
wire 1 + + + + + <== + + + + + + +
<== - - - - - - - <==== -------------
wire 2 + + + + + <== + + + + + + +
charge density of e-'s in other
wire is greater than that of p+'s
Interesting footnote to this: when Maxwell first derived the relationship between electric current and magnetism he postulated the existence of a fixed medium, aether, through which light travels at a constant speed. For a while measuring the Earth's relative velocity to the aether proved challenging. Einstein eventually did away with the concept of aether and asserted that light moves at the same speed in all reference frames, thus reconciling mechanics and electromagnetism.
Einstein didn't do away with the concept, Michelson and Morley did.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experi...
Einstein filled the hole they left. It is worth mentioning because Morley was the first American to win the Nobel in Physics. That experiment changed business as usual.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experi...
Einstein filled the hole they left. It is worth mentioning because Morley was the first American to win the Nobel in Physics. That experiment changed business as usual.
The free electrons in a conductor move at nothing near the speed of light, though.
Even though the speed of the electrons is nowhere near the speed of light, electromagnetism is so strong that the tiny length contraction at those speeds is enough to produce the magnetic force.
Yes, this is the correct answer. It's a relativistic effect that is nonetheless observable at velocities not usually considered to be relativistic.
I think this is extremely cool, BTW: any ordinary refrigerator magnet serves to demonstrate the truth of special relativity. Indeed, since the propagation of a photon involves oscillating electric and magnetic fields, the very existence of light itself depends on relativity.
So in a strange and unexpected way, one could say that when Michelson and Morley went searching for the ether, they actually found it. The fact that the speed of light is the same in every inertial reference frame is precisely what allows it to propagate at all.
I think this is extremely cool, BTW: any ordinary refrigerator magnet serves to demonstrate the truth of special relativity. Indeed, since the propagation of a photon involves oscillating electric and magnetic fields, the very existence of light itself depends on relativity.
So in a strange and unexpected way, one could say that when Michelson and Morley went searching for the ether, they actually found it. The fact that the speed of light is the same in every inertial reference frame is precisely what allows it to propagate at all.
I may be confusing propagation speed and drift velocity--it's been a while since I learned this, and I think there is some way to rationalize that the net current is really moving close to the speed of light when you add/subtract the motions of all the individual particles, even if none of them in isolation are moving anywhere close to that speed.
In any case, this article explains the whole matter a lot better than I could.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_electromagnetism
In any case, this article explains the whole matter a lot better than I could.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_electromagnetism
The drift speed of electrons in an conductor is slow. The actual velocity they travel at is much faster. Though the actual range defies me at this point, so I have no idea if relativistic effects are noticeable.
>... imagine you ARE an electron ...
>In any interval of time, you pass twice as many electrons as you do protons. Because opposite charges attract, this produces an attractive force ...
I think you mean repulsive?
>In any interval of time, you pass twice as many electrons as you do protons. Because opposite charges attract, this produces an attractive force ...
I think you mean repulsive?
I prefer this explanation by Richard Feynman:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO0r930Sn_8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO0r930Sn_8
That's not really an explanation, though. It's really saying - you don't know enough (yet) for me to explain what I know, although I don't know everything.
It was still the best explanation he could give.
I think this summarizes the article: "Why? We don't really know, but we can observe some consistent rules."
Comments tl;dr: Electric fields + special relativity = magnetic fields
This is 'relatively' unknown triumph of special relativity ;-)
"What led me more or less directly to the special theory of relativity was the conviction that the electromotive force acting on a body in motion in a magnetic field was nothing else but an electric field." - Albert Einstein
This is 'relatively' unknown triumph of special relativity ;-)
"What led me more or less directly to the special theory of relativity was the conviction that the electromotive force acting on a body in motion in a magnetic field was nothing else but an electric field." - Albert Einstein
Here's a question for you. Take two bar magnets. Put one on a table. Hold the other above it. The magnet on the table will be attracted to the one you're holding and will jump up and stick to it. The magnet on the table has just done some work. But magnetic fields do no work. What just happened?
You did the work by moving the magnets away from each other. This converts some of the kinetic energy you created by moving them into potential energy. As you moved the magnets back closer to each other, some of this potential energy converted back to kinetic energy, until they were close enough that the force exerted by the magnetic field exceeded that of gravity, at which point there was a large conversion of magnetic potential energy into kinetic, and then gravitational potential energy.
Further, note that since a force was exerted over a distance , work was indisputably done. Exactly what did that work is a matter of opinion, but work was certainly done.
Further, note that since a force was exerted over a distance , work was indisputably done. Exactly what did that work is a matter of opinion, but work was certainly done.
As it jumps, the magnet in your hand grows heavier. Your arm does the work.
I don't see any relativity in the actual post, but I'm happy to see it here in the comments. For more info, of course, the real source is Einstein's "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies"
reminds me of that : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvmvxAcT_Yc
Disclaimer: This may be utterly wrong. This is my understanding from the internet and a first-year engineering electromagnetism course.