> Zinzindohoué agrees: “We don’t need to wait for others to come to our country to show us what is under our sea. We are the ones who must take responsibility.
> “When our staff reviewed and cleared those accounts, the same bug prevented the ban from being lifted automatically, so it just stayed in place,” Discord says.
It seems like a similar issue is affecting Twitter currently. People are being suspended for inauthentic behavior, they appeal, they get an email saying the appeal was accepted, and then, nothing, the account doesn't come back. Is there perhaps a third party moderation platform behind both of these services?
I mean, I probably saw this when I was 4 or so, and I don't have any children now. I can't really blame my four year old self for being impressionable. I'd say this is probably more of an example of why people should be cautious of the kind of content they put in front of their kids.
I want to be able to experiment with tweaking model weights and seeing the outcomes and i want to be able to finetune open source models. What's the best way to experiment with that without breaking the bank?
I was an IC procrastinating on my real work, not a manager. I think I implemented this in Github during my first sprint on the team. Managers are probably wise enough to the way of humans to not attempt something like this (Goodhart's Law and all that). I know as a fact my peers started pointing to the high score list I made as a way to start justifying asking for raises and things like that, to demonstrate that they were pulling their weight on the team harder than others.
I made a high score list for my team to get people to care about catching bugs during code review.
The gamifying started immediately.
If you ever make anything competitive there will be that one guy trying to cheat his way to the top.
The high score list was supposed to be for finding logic errors. This guy was trying to pass off finding typos in text strings as equivalent to finding something that would blow up prod if pushed up.
got a random pair up with this model on lmarena. it was outperformed by gemma-4-31b. suffice to say i'm not impressed (or maybe i am impressed with gemma?)
yeah that seems fine. there's like no good reason to do that. are you trying to simulate reality or something?
but my point still stands, choose whichever calculation you think is important to be able to do with Ω, defined as f(Ω), square it for good measure, and set that as the max, the min, and the number of numbers in between each integer.
The total number of possible numbers will be ~2*f(Ω)⁴ which should be more than enough numbers :)
Contact me at noviasupernova (@) gmail