Isn’t this a thing for all providers? YouTube definitely spies on what you look at and Netflix knows as well. Or is this just because a TV actually doesn’t provide the content, just the view? And is there’s a difference if you have a streaming device like Roku?
Gödel wrote his teorem to test David Hilbert’s endeavor, Logic and the Foundation of Mathematics[0], to unify mathematics. Gödel proved that it is impossible to do.
Wouldn’t it be possible that not all brains can do it all, but some can specialize in certain problems. But when combined with everyone else’s we can approach general intelligence?
What do you mean? It implements the Future/Task interface and you can definitely use that. In fact you can’t tell the difference from a virtual thread vs a platform one, and it’s available everywhere. I for one thinks it’s much easier to use than the async/await pattern as I don’t need any special syntax to use it.
> My rough understanding is that this is similar to async/await in .NET?
The biggest difference is that C# async/await code is rewritten by the compiler to be able to be async. This means that you see artifacts in the stack that weren’t there when you wrote the code.
There are no rewrites with virtual threads and the code is presented on the stack just as you write it.
They solve the same problem but in very different ways.
When talking to LLMs their responses are always a bit off. The best way I can describe it, it’s like they are speaking a specific dialect but you know they are using expressions that wouldn’t be used in that dialect. Or, it’s like they are way over their head in the specific matter and reiterate things they really don’t understand. Like there’s no substance in what they are saying.
And if they do this for a simple or a matter that you know of, how can you trust their answers in a matter if you can’t evaluate their answer?
It doesn’t get better when they are totally mixing things up but say it with certainty, instead of just saying that they don’t know or admit that they have gaps in what they know. They don’t just get it wrong like humans do, it’s just weirdly wrong. Humans usually get it consistently wrong. Perhaps it’s about what they are not saying.
Would I always be able to tell it’s not a human I talk with, probably not. But chances are that I will know, the longer I talk to them.
How do you do that? And which companies does not have these today?