I'm curious what you think about Clojurescript? leaving aside that it may be harder for teams to move to Clojurescript than to improve their JS codebase.
The reason for the question is that Clojurescript supports all the FP idioms of your slides more naturally and also has more FP features.
Looking at the table of contents from amazon, it looks like the book covers the basic data structures, but the book's website says the following:
"I assume the reader has completed the equivalent of a second programming course, typically titled Data Structures or Computer Science II."
So its confusing to know the target audience. To me it looks like someone with one language under his belt and some basic math(algebra/precalculus?) can do alright.
When developing a web application for phone, tablet and desktop, is it a good principle to use the same HTML for the three and a separate CSS for each device?
Why would you remap the left option key to ctrl when you already have two left ctrl keys (caps and original ctrl) ? I do set the right option key to ctrl but only in iterm and emacs.
That's why apple keyboards (macbooks, imacs) bother me, they don't have a right ctrl key. (I set the right option key to ctrl in both iterm2 and gui emacs.
That some google services were rewritten in golang doesn't really say much, in a video Rob Pike himself said that lots of services in google can't and shouldn't be rewritten in Go because of the GC, the video: http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2014/Pan... - At 31:20 Andrei starts talking about the problem of the GC with the scale of Facebook, you can start watching there.
When you are developing a web application for phone, tablet and desktop, is it a good principle to use the same HTML for the three and a separate CSS for each device? is there a case where this would cause problems?
But Google is not pushing GWT anymore since a long time, they don't want more adoption of the framework, instead, they want you to start using Dart, so beware of GWT's future.
I'm not a KDE user, but from reading on the internetz I have this feeling that KDE in general is evaded by users, users don't see it as much of a option or as the last option, this commit also doesn't mention KDE.
Some say the problem with KDE is that you have to drink the whole koolaid, but not sure if that is really the reason.
The reason for the question is that Clojurescript supports all the FP idioms of your slides more naturally and also has more FP features.