If you work in the AI industry, it’s time to preserve the engineering innovations you built -- before the risk of a bursting bubble skyrockets.
- Did you build libraries to efficiently analyze specific data formats?
- Did you work on lean and fast serialization?
- Did you create optimizing orchestration tools for GPU-bound tasks with dependencies?
- …
… then please try to get them released as FOSS!
That way you ensure that even if the bubble bursts, the fruits of your labor will survive and their legacy can improve software for decades to come.
(you’re welcome to extend the list in the comments)
On Hyphanet (the original Freenet) there’s been working group chat via a Hyphanet-backed IRC server for over a decade (the server is named FLIP, the first working version was released in 2013, developed purely on Freenet/Hyphanet).
There was no public debate, but he did start to talk to devs 18 months before, and the devs told him quite clearly that they strongly object to repurposing the name.
And that repurposing the name would cause lots of damage.
> What are the content patterns on Freenet? Four patterns were identified. Freenet is (1) an archive of deviant data resistant to censorship (2) a space dominated by content associated with masculinity, (3) a nonmarket space where commercial exchange is non-existent, and (4) an empty space with many requests not returning information, and many flogs abandoned. We asked a third question: How does the analysis of Freenet inform current understandings of hacker culture? Freenet, we suggest, can be understood as a type of digital “wilderness”. It is a singular darknet space, supporting a distinct set of hacker practices
Practically: people in Hyphanet blog about stuff they dare not blog about in the clearnet -- anything from radical politics (from all kinds, left, right, libertarian, …) over personal opinion pages to wilder stuff like magick (yes, in that spelling).
Not to forget the Russian Poet who’s posting daily poems with the goal (as he wrote) that those poems still survive after police knocked at his door.
(besides talk about hyphanet and privacy tech)
So yes: I don’t understand the downvotes either, because it’s a legitimate question with a pretty clear answer: yes.
Providing a concise start, a no-frills, opinionated intro to programming from first define to deploying an application on just 64 pages.
What is Scheme?
Scheme is a programming language — a Lisp — that follows the principle “design not by piling feature on top of feature, but by removing the weaknesses and restrictions that make additional features appear necessary”.
Freenet / Hyphanet 0.7.5 build 1503 is now available.
This is a shared release announcement for 1502 and 1503. 1502 fixed an
inserter tracing vulnerability and added several features while 1503
is a hotfix release that fixes regressions in 1502. The main changes are:
- fix vulnerability
- reduce visibility on the network
- support animated webp and more modern HTML and CSS
- enable direct linking to Freemail’s “New Message” page
- dismiss alerts and convenience
- substantial routing optimizations
- bug fixes
Hyphanet is a peer-to-peer platform for
censorship-resistant and privacy-respecting
publishing and communication.
It’s beautiful how in the end he writes how this actually helps him.
My experience is that whenever I skip organizing my tasks with org-mode, I lose focus and time.
An example: While duplicating the gist of JIRA issues in my local org-file may seem wasteful, whenever I tried to leave it out, my completion time for tickets ballooned. I tried multiple times.
There’s just no other tool that worked for me, even though I’ve tried to use many over the years.
You don’t let your kids jailbreak their Switch. Because it’s a damn online system, so any leaked info and Nintendo can brick the Switch. And their game states are far too valuable for the kids for that.
Don’t you have a virtual server? I’m pretty sure that my managed webserver runs on some virtual machine somewhere on a bigger server, and when it is not doing stuff, other tasks are running there and using the CPU and bandwidth.
There is likely some fixed memory and disk space cost, but those are negligible with todays capacities.
One of the big strength of the Web is the commitment of Mozilla „do not break the web“.
But this is hitting its limits, because the scope of Javascript is being expanded more and more (including stuff like filesystem APIs for almost arbitrary file access — as if we had not learned from Java WebStart that that’s a rabbit hole that never stops gifting vulnerabilities), so to keep new features safe despite their much higher security needs, old features are neutered.
I lost a decentralized comment system to similar changes.
I know why I no longer have a mildly dynamic website: the security risk of PHP is not linear.
That’s where Javascript shines: if you avoid comments (those are actually a hard problem: a social one) and server-side data (security risk), it actually has this linear increase in effort without the jump in security risk.
And this risk has increased a lot since the early mildly dynamic websites.
That’s why moderation must scale better than lies.
In the original Freenet (now Hyphanet) it does, because when several people you communicate with block something, it disappears for you, too. When that was added (years ago, because having no centralized power means it was needed much earlier), communication got much more friendly in a pretty short amount of time.
You can create a new ID to see it anyway — or explicitly make a spammer visible — but there’s usually no need, because you’ll actually not want to see stuff your friends identified as lies. And you can see who blocks what, so if you should doubt your friends (i.e. because something you like disappeared), you can stop their blocking from affecting you.
And centralized moderation tools gravitate towards favoring these lies.
Even worse: lies about climate change are nowadays being spread via paid Youtube advertisements. This kind of centralized power should never have existed in the first place.
1. takes unlicensed peptides, because the insurance declined to pay for what the doctor prescribed.
2. «“people generally don't try to quantify tail risks.” Among the people I talked to, this is true»
That’s a pretty bad outlook.