Off topic, I love your site - it's a perfect homage to a loving family tradition (even if it was only for a couple of vacations). This site is, I think, an example of what a beautiful internet could be (and maybe is, if anyone knows got to find more sites like this-really authentic stories). Now, I hope I'm not being fooled by an AI generated story, but even if I am, I am happy to believe in that illusion.
Edit: After reflecting on this situation, your creation, your art: the css library paired with your story gave me a modern day Norman Rockwell dopamine hit. This has been an absolute experience, bravo to the collaboration!
No, and it has the single-maintainer problem (buses, lottery, etc.). The tool has a high learning curve and hidden/unexplained features that you have to read years-old forum posts to use correctly. Lunar magic is great, but there is tons of room for improvement. There has been at least one attempt to solve this problem, though progress has been slow: https://github.com/SMW-Editor/smw-editor.
Multiple non-unique SSIDs (name) can exist within a single router. More extremely, you and your neighbor can have the same SSID on two different routers.
Can you go into more detail about this? I may be misunderstanding, but I read 'never persisted' as meaning my users must provide credentials for every API call.
I think this is where the disconnect is. As a best faith interpretation, I don't believe you made the statement in a condescending manner -- I think it just flowed naturally.
The comment I quoted seems to imply waking a patient is akin to disrupting the comfort of the patient. I read the arguments being made in this thread and in the article as: waking the patient and/or disturbing sleep of a patient causes detrimental effects on the patient's health which lie outside the realm of just comfort.
Multi-patient bays seem to act as an architectural reinforcement that sleep is a comfort.
I think you nailed the marketing of this change. Though, if Flickr posted the steps/goals to making the user a "priority" rather than a "product," I would be more convinced. A cursory read of their TOS doesn't indicate any changes (though this may be premature as the changes are not in effect), and their (1)non-blog upgrade post doesn't seem to indicate any changes in data collection/selling.
As an aside, if you were looking to subscribe to their Pro product, the link in the blog post contains a coupon for $15 off their yearly subscription.
You haven't received a print issue this year? That makes me think my story may not be unique.
I ordered a subscription to the physical magazine on May 1st of this year. Liz (managing editor) responded to my two inquiries about shipping. Each time she stated shipping was 2-3 weeks away. Both of those time frames were missed. Liz stated there were issues with the production of one issue (specifically #24).
Nearly four months after ordering, I am still product-less. I asked for a refund earlier this week, and I haven't gotten a response--I have escalated the issue to PayPal at this point. The order is marked as refunded on naultil.us's store page, but I haven't seem any action on the PayPal end.
From a previous post I made about it:
"We have HTTP endpoints set up to receive data from our ERP's accounting system to send data to Concur and to update customers' Lawson punchout ordering systems with shipment information. The 'E' is an HTTP post with an XML payload. The 'T' consists of using the payload to query other databases to build the 'L' payload, and the 'L' is an HTTP post to the consumer's endpoints."
I think there is valid confusion to be had in interpreting this statement.
Usually, when a statement of "choose either x or y" is made, then the only valid options are exclusively x or exclusively y (None and Both are not valid).
Though, when the statement of "if either x or y then do action" is made, then the action is done with any of three valid options: x, y, or x and y (only None is not valid).
To change the second statement to mean the first, you could say "if only x or only y then do action." The "only" cancel Both as being an option.
Can you explain what you mean by the math not being correct? I verified the previous poster's calculations. They do seem to be correct. Is this an issue with notation: $ vs. c?
This reminds me of Verizon .02 cents debacle from a while back.
I haven't re/viewed the product/website, but I do want to mention that I immediately pronounced the product name as "H-IVY" (aitch-ivee) in my mind. There may be a stigma associated with that pronunciation.
We are using Apache NiFi[1] to handle a lot of our ETL use cases.
We have HTTP endpoints set up to receive data from our ERP's accounting system to send data to Concur and to update customers' Lawson punchout ordering systems with shipment information. The 'E' is an HTTP post with an XML payload. The 'T' consists of using the payload to query other databases to build the 'L' payload, and the 'L' is an HTTP post to the consumer's endpoints.
Further, we have NiFi handling HL7 messages inside hospitals. The 'T' is the real winner, here. NiFi has built in transformer for HL7 messages which makes them a breeze with which to work.
EDIT: I wanted to add that we've also used the EventHub processor to connect NiFi to Azure's services as well, and it has been rock solid for us.
NiFi's data provenance, flowfile/attribute system, back pressure settings, auto-queueing, retrying capabilities all make it very reliable and robust.
Can you elaborate on how The Stranger influenced your outlook on life?
I ask because the person who recommended it to me saw the protagonist as a hero -- someone inspiring.
I read it as a cautionary tale. It showed me one could be apathetic to a fault in regards to their fate. The only thing he seemed to care about was actively not caring about his or others' lives.
Edit: After reflecting on this situation, your creation, your art: the css library paired with your story gave me a modern day Norman Rockwell dopamine hit. This has been an absolute experience, bravo to the collaboration!