Same here - though I used my personal email domain with claude as the local/username. They autobanned that one and then banned my actual personal email. The only one that worked was a Google login. My appeal had a boilerplate response.
Anthropic has banned my own accounts before I used them for violating ToS. Appeals do nothing. Only when I started using a Google login did they stop banning them. This isn’t an OpenAI-only problem.
I had two accounts banned - one for Claude and one for the API. I tried to appeal both asking for more information. The response from Anthropic was non-specific and only that it violates usage. One account had only been minimally used. One never used. The accounts used email addresses using a domain I control - e.g., [email protected] for example. I think that might have something to do with it.
I have a new account now using a Google account and it hasn’t been banned.
My model Y has trouble with sunny weather today, so even that isn’t quite solved. Driving east into the morning sun constantly gives warnings that the camera needs to be cleaned.
Bloomberg | Software Engineer - Infrastructure | ONSITE in New York, Princeton, London | Full-time
Bloomberg is hiring experienced software engineers to build high-performance infrastructure that powers real-time financial data for global markets. We process massive datasets from regulatory agencies, exchanges, central banks, and financial institutions—fueling Bloomberg products and AI-driven insights. Our work directly impacts traders, analysts, and decision-makers worldwide.
We tackle hard distributed systems problems at scale, from low-latency data processing to cloud/hybrid computing, leveraging cutting-edge open-source & proprietary technologies.
I joined Bloomberg in 2020 via its acquisition of Second Measure (YC S15) and stayed because of the challenging problems and the freedom to solve them. Bloomberg values deep technical expertise and gives engineers real ownership over impactful projects.
We're hiring for roles in these locations with 3-days in office most weeks:
Bloomberg | Software Engineer - Infrastructure | ONSITE in New York, Princeton, London | Full-time
Bloomberg is hiring experienced software engineers to build high-performance infrastructure that powers real-time financial data for global markets. We process massive datasets from regulatory agencies, exchanges, central banks, and financial institutions—fueling Bloomberg products and AI-driven insights. Our work directly impacts traders, analysts, and decision-makers worldwide.
We tackle hard distributed systems problems at scale, from low-latency data processing to cloud/hybrid computing, leveraging cutting-edge open-source & proprietary technologies.
I joined Bloomberg in 2020 via its acquisition of Second Measure (YC S15) and stayed because of the challenging problems and the freedom to solve them. Bloomberg values deep technical expertise and gives engineers real ownership over impactful projects.
We're hiring for roles in these locations with 3-days in office most weeks:
Agreed - how it contextualizes the time and place for Montaigne when writing the essays is invaluable to understanding the essays and how he changes over time.
If you’re already in the Kubernetes system, Argo Workflows has either capabilities designed around what you are describing or can be built using the templates supported (container, script, resource). If you’re not on Kubernetes, then Argo Workflows is not worth it on its own because it does demand expertise there to wield it effectively.
Someone suggested Temporal below and that’s a good suggestion too if you’re fine with a managed service.
It is in the article how the cost is not necessarily just from a family’s use of oil but the additional cost added to other things (like food, goods) because it costs more to transport those because of higher gas prices. Those costs are passed on to families so your grocery bill is higher because of it too.
I don’t think the original point being made was that NYT wasn’t justified in bringing the action. The point that was being made was the suit would be ultimately meaningless in the long term even if it was successful in the short term. There is a potentially more significant risk in the future that this suit will not protect against because of the reasons enumerated by the author. While the author is speculating, the law struggles with technology and adapting to change, which makes their prediction useful because it does highlight the problems that are coming that can’t be readily mitigated through legal precedent.
My experience as well. My two are so different it’s hard to even parent at times as they need different kinds of attention. You can’t really give yourself in different ways at the same time. We recognize that one - being born in the lockdown environment - is likely different in meaningful ways than our first. Our first is helpful in she almost recognizes a difference.