You can't do without either of them, but one can hide flaws in the other
I was listening to a podcast the other day and something caught my hear: the difference between a VP and a C-level is that the C stands for confidence.
> in film, you start with the best and make your way down to the worst
only if you take imdb top films ranking...
take a tour through Kurosawa or other Japanese masters, get deep into korean cinema, lose yourself in the Italian masterpieces, and jump into French movies as soon as you can. You'll get challenged, immersed, and amazed again!
You'll see that you really start at the bottom and move upwards
Criterion and similar alternative streaming platforms sound like where you should be spending your time, instead of amazon prime ;)
But then again, from that report, most are fossil fuel producing companies. So one would imagine that less fossil fuel demand would reduce the impact of those companies and have an even more important effect on CO2 emissions
Unless there's a unified effort between major browsers to bring support for a new language we'll have to use js. And that seems highly unlikely (see dart for instance). However, you now have languages that compile to js, that start to satisfy most developer needs, as well as the sketchy evolution of js.
Besides whamlastxmas point, the danger that I see is also tied to copyright infringement.
Imgur and other small sites, mostly because they don't have much profit, don't suffer a lot from copyright takedowns. I think reddit won't have the same treatment, and Imgur will still be a viable long-term solution.
Even if you're supposedly giving money to reputable developers that are the percentile less likely to commit fraud, there's still a risk of it happening.
A more reasonable approach would be a monthly or a "version" contribution.
Even better than that would be a "fund" where you pledged your money to developers/projects, and it would be distributed equally or by a clear metric.
Hydroelectric generation is not the major source of energy. Wind is, and I think it was that unusual amount of rain, coupled with stronger winds and the occasional good days of sun that contributed to this milestone.
Besides the sun, I think the ocean will be our safest bet. The technology seems to be lacking though.
That kind of control is in the hands of the webapp.
For instance if I close this tab, where I'm typing the comment, there will be no prompt. Whereas facebook will prompt me if truly want to leave the page.
I might be the minority here, but I think that using the backspace to go back is counter intuitive. In my mind backspace is to delete something, and I always worry about that.
I'm going on a limb here, but nowadays, 60% of macbooks (mainly the pro) are used for software development and 30% for creative work (video and editing). While something like half of those professional applications would be fine with the 9X, the other half would be left hanging for a better machine.
However, if they want to make the switch in the near future, I think that the new MacBook will first be released with an ARM processor. This way they won't alienate their core market and they will have a testing ground. Then, I'd predict two or three generations until the pros catch up.
> The only problem is around Carbon
They have the money, if they want to change to ARM it won't be Carbon stopping them.
I was listening to a podcast the other day and something caught my hear: the difference between a VP and a C-level is that the C stands for confidence.