Regarding his statement: "It doesn’t require much of an imagination to see how this information could be abused."
Rogozov answers: Yes it does! In fact, that is the whole point of the blog entry, and it's completely skipped over. Their was a lot of writing, but the whole point of the article was left as an exercise for the reader. Why be so lazy? There needs to be a set of concrete examples of how these information breeches actually hurt real people. Saying, "their privacy has been violated in a pretty drastic manner leading to death, identity theft or embarrassment" isn't specific enough, and as a reader, I don't buy that the Nazis are going to take over in America someday so they can eradicate all the Jews in the employment of the United States government.
Rogozov believes in his main point -- but we need specific examples that people (who actually vote) can relate to this.
Rogozov believes in his main point -- but we need specific examples that people (who actually vote) can relate to this.