bing/chatgpt is already known to give false citations and not understand time in its reply, why are we thinking that its reply about its design is anything to be believed?
That made me wonder:
- Why does it seem like Japanese manufacturers are the only ones making "different" phones?
- Many other threads are talking about the lack of components and lack of component manufacturer interest, but if so, how did the Japanese manufacturers did it?
- What is special about the Japanese market that allows these phones to survive?
- What difficulty would there be for let's say Rakuten to sell their phones internationally just like Sony did?
A few points of relevant observation:
- Japanese consumer electronics manufacturers have a habit of keeping their best products only to Japan - such as DSLRs.
- There is a strong customer base for mini devices in Japan. GPD pocket laptops are in regular stores.
This is definitely something that should be fixed by the vendor, but as a (Firefox) user if you want a quick fix you can use https://github.com/pyllyukko/user.js
ownCloud Music app (https://github.com/owncloud/music) contributor here, I integrated Aurora.js with owncloud music app, and created a compatibility layer for Aurora.js and SoundManager2 (https://github.com/owncloud/music/pull/416). Audiocogs's ogg.js doesn't work, so I use browser's built-in decoder via SoundManager instead.
And Aurora.js' doesn't seem to be maintained anymore, I tried very hard to make it build, finding that the build scripts was intended to work on OSX (version unclear), but the developer never mentions it. And even if it builds, the result doesn't really work, Aurora.js, ogg.js, flac.js, alac.js... none of them, as far as I remember.
So actually in the owncloud music app we just downloaded the built js files from the demo site :-p
It leaves me great ponder after reading the comments. After all, is "being kind" the general rule? Should it be a general rule? Or is it just an attitude towards certain kinds of personality (or the belief by people who have these personalities)?
Recently read about the 16 personality types of psychology http://www.16personalities.com/personality-types, I guess Boz is more of a "debater", like myself, who doesn't care much about the attitudes, instead we focus on the idea itself that is being conveyed, to fully understand it, and to dig out all implications and foundations.
The article seems to encourage us to become more like the "diplomats", to understand people's feelings.
Should I change? should we change? or should we just "be kind" to the sensitive people, and be ourself, ie. direct, honest but probably not kind, around other people?
The doubt I have on being kind boils down to overhead, it leaves a huge hole to misinterpretations, and just as people say in the comments, sometimes people see your kindness as unimportance.
For myself, I'd rather be offended then to be "protected by (mis)interpretations" of others on me. I hate to find out people specially crafting their speech in order to convince me. I am intelligent and mature enough to seperate the attitudes and the ideas of speech.
Nevertheless, I do see the value of what's Boz suggesting, I guess being kind is maybe an overstatement, instead, being thoughtful is more conservative, and thus, a more general rule.
I've also been holding the same view as you since teenage, I believe the world operates by continuous contradictions and compromises or amendments. I expect myself to honestly directly pointing out the wrong of others, but also to proactively recognize and amend my own faults when others point out.
From my own recent experience and Boz's article, I am forced to realize that not just all people operates this way, I should simply adjust. Though I still genuinely believe this is the most efficient way for people to grow and improve, because this way eliminates all the overhead of misinterpretations.
Good point on caring differently about the outcome, you reminds me that I might be caring too much on winning the conversation much of the time.
> it might not matter all that much if you can't get your ideas across to the other person this particular moment.
Yeah, I have always been eager to get my ideas through (because I want to get things done), with your words I see now I don't need to rush getting ideas through all at once, it should be done in a timely manner.
I guess this is why some people describe me as being too eager or impetuous, I see the reason now.
Socratic approach really seems to be a good suitable way around this, thanks a lot for the tip.
> Many conversations we are planning our next point rather than really deeply observing and listening to the other person
I often hear similiar suggestions to be empathic on others, but I find it difficult in practice too. To deeply observe others and to understand their points and to accurately express my points all at the same time is hard for me. Simply considering phrasing and planning my points alone is mentally exhausting enough. (I admit my verbal skill is not that good.) Let alone to mention considering others' feelings.
I did try to think about others' feelings, then I found myself having to pause and think (which is not so good for a conversation), sometimes forgetting others' points, and sometimes making less clear, reasonable, persuasive points.
Just sharing my experience, I guess this all could be improved by practice. Though I'd be thrilled for some tips.
Yeah, I know rolling release distros, though I haven't used any of them. Though I should have mentioned it.
Just put up a disclaimer.
I often hear stability issues with Tumbleweed, and even more complaints of software breaking after an upgrade (software upgrade, not OS upgrade) on ArchLinux. (I heard ArchLinux's philosophy is "fix it yourself")
So I guess you can get more stable bleeding edge software in FreeBSD than OpenSUSE Tumbleweed and ArchLinux. I don't know the case with Gentoo, I don't often hear things about it.
I have few experience with Linux distros other than Ubuntu, so I'm only comparing FreeBSD with Ubuntu. Linux distros are so diverse I don't think you can just compare all of them with FreeBSD anyway.
I have both FreeBSD servers and Ubuntu servers. Thing I like the most with FreeBSD is its further separation (compared with Ubuntu) of OS (kernel and world) from third-party software.
In Ubuntu every package comes in multiple versions for different releases, in FreeBSD there's only one version.
There's no "because I want git 1.8 so I have to upgrade to Ubuntu 14.04", in FreeBSD you can install the latest version of git on all supported OS versions. (In my experience even a slightly outdated OS version can run latest third-party software quite smoothly)
Software in FreeBSD Ports (its system getting third-party software) catch up with upstream releases very quickly. You might think they have less testing than that is in Ubuntu/Debian, but I don't know if it's really the case. Though I rarely encounter bugs with these cutting-edge software in FreeBSD.
I speak mainly from the experience with Ubuntu, I'm not so familiar with other Linux distros.