I wonder if you can delete your entire existing history to sort of reset the recommendation engine? i've definitely had to delete individual ones from my history to downrank similar ones in the past.
I don't want to be glib - but perhaps it is because our "context window lengths" extend back a bit further than yours?
Big tech (not just AI companies) have been viewed with some degree of suspicion ever since Google's mantra of "Don't be evil" became a meme over a decade ago.
Regardless of where you stand on the concept of copyright law, it is an indisputable fact that in order for these companies to get to where they are today - they deliberately HOOVERED up terabytes of copyrighted materials without the consent or even knowledge of the original authors.
You might look into era specific LoRas if they exist, and if not consider training a few to help better capture architectural detail from that specific time frame.
"Slots are often found on bases where there is precious little to do, like Diego Garcia – a 12-sq.-mile island in the Indian Ocean with a population of just over 4,000 people – where the Navy runs 52 slot machines"
Talk about a captive audience rife for exploitation.
I've had good luck with using them as an alternative to the Google Translate API, but they're entering a pretty crowded space, e.g. Sudowrite, Jasper, Grammarly.
I've even used ChatGPT's zero shot to do some editorial clean-ups with the prompt:
I am going to provide paragraphs of text in quotation marks that may contain spelling errors, grammatical issues, continuity errors, structural problems, etc. I would like you to produce a revised version with all of the above issues fixed. Do not begin until I provide text enclosed in quotation marks.
It really depends on what you mean. Anxiety is something that is really contextual and depends on the person, unfortunately I don't have a great deal to offer on the subject.
Speaking as an introvert, I came across an interesting piece of advice from Ken Jennings, a record holding Jeopardy contestant. He basically talked about how trivia could be used in a practical sense to open conversational doors. By having a great of knowledge on a wide variety of subjects, there is almost a certainty that you'll be able to connect with a stranger, at least at some nominal level.
People love being asked about themselves, and if you know something about a hobby that they're passionate about, you can ask more poignant questions.
For example, if somebody tells me the that they're into juggling, I can ask them about the kinds of patterns that they like to do, mills mess, cascade, etc.
If they're into aviation, I can ask if they prefer flying high or low wing aircraft, playfully quiz them on METAR, and commiserate on how paralyzingly hard it was to be talking to a towered airport for the first time.
If they're into music, we can discuss harmonic theory, instrumental technique, and our favorite musicians.
And so on. It takes a conscious and deliberate effort, but the rewards are a deeper interaction beyond mere small talk.
Unfortunately, this is not an ungrounded fear. There have already been instances of clone websites setup that mirror other sites content, feed those blog posts through GPT and rewrite them, passing them off as their own. There was a link pasted to HN not too long ago about this very issue.
TLDR: Feeding your own ideas/thoughts into GPT to rephrase them in a logical, consistent and more fluid manner is a great use of the tool. Using it to plagiarize other's ideas without citing your sources shows a staggering lack of integrity.