Claude logs the conversation to ~/.claude/projects, so you can write a tool to view them. I made a quick tool that has been valuable the last few weeks: https://github.com/panozzaj/cc-tail
I enjoyed this game! I have the ][ and played it on the "The Apple At Play" [1] disk (both are in the closet right behind me.) I think it actually might have been a different version than the one you have.
I made a handful of GPT "games" a couple of months ago, one of which was a Lemonade Stand clone. Can try it out at [2].
It does some interesting things around rolling random numbers in Python for the weather and it's nice that you can put in free-form text to say what you want to do for your actions. It's definitely more hackable than the original (good prompt security test.)
@jacquesm: I am curious how you approached charging for this project due to the uncertainty of what was wrong and how long it might take to fix it, and of the importance of this to the company. As you say, this may have saved the company. Did you work on an hourly / weekly / project basis? If you can talk about this, that is. Thanks for the writeup, this seemed like a great challenge!
Actually, I appreciate your comment. I (tell myself I) was not able to commit to publishing previously because I could not make much time to provide updates. However, I think 1) this was probably a cop-out 2) the next couple of months will be more open. I am going to remove some interim text and/or comment it out and then publish for half price or something like that. Thanks for the push!
I'm working on a book talking about how to write effectively using Vim ("Writing With Vim"), sign up for updates at: https://leanpub.com/vim-for-writers. I need a few more weekends and it should be good to go. It's at about fifty pages right now and covers philosophy, basic customizations, things that are built into Vim as well as plugins, and will cover some publishing workflows.
True. I would like to have used a nice JS library or something so you could drill down better. Putting numbers on the charts would have been nice to get a sense of the actual sizes (especially on the ones with very small slivers.) Will keep this in mind for next time!
Thanks rauljara and automach. I agree that the pie charts were probably not the best way to represent the data that was gathered. The questions could all take multiple answers, and I just summed the results to figure out how big of a piece of the pie each section would get. I made a quick edit to the post to clarify this. Thanks for taking the time to write that up, would appreciate any tips on how to better represent multiple answers per person per question.