In the analogy provided (comparing a smart contract in a money laundering case to a gun in a murder trial) - wouldn't the responsibility lie with the person who operated the instrument?
In the gun analogy, wouldn't the comparison be putting the CEO of Smith & Wesson on trial because someone used one of their pistols in a murder?
Like a pistol, the Tornado Cash smart contract has legitimate and illegitimate use cases.
The thing about a flash attack is that you don't need to be rich to buy that many tokens. You can borrow funds, buy the tokens with borrowed funds, execute your vote, sell the tokens, and then return the funds all in the same transaction.
Same. I'm from a product/tech background and working with a People (aka HR) team these days. Google Hire looked very appealing since we're on Gsuite but now I'm really happy that my spidey-senses told me not to take the risk.
I want to try using Google Hire to recruit talent at my company but unfortunately I feel as if I've been conditioned to believe that there is a higher probability of the product being killed compared to its alternatives.