I've never measured my thinking speed before. This measurement is intriguing. I feel that speed of thinking will be inversely proportional to the quality of content we write. Also, even if I can think fast and write quickly, I might have to go back and make amendments which can reduce my average thinking speed.
3 WPM really shook me as well. Today we complain about not having enough time to work on our projects, but back in the good old days, as successful as Dijkstra was, got time to spend 3 WPM and still produced close to 7k articles! Astonishing.
Just read a few of these EWDs. Some of my favorite quotes I read came from the end of these reports.
> The question of whether a machine can think is the same as the question of whether a submarine can swim.
> In this respect the programmer does not differ from any other craftsman: unless he loves his tools it is highly improbable that he will ever create something of superior quality.
The article is very well written and is full of insights into Dijkstra's thought process.
If there exist a site that works like facebook or maybe even better, the question is how will it earn without monetizing user's data?
Take all good parts of facebook and remove all the privacy, security, spamming issues, whatever remains is user and its data.
If now, the only step taken by facebook is to earn money by putting ads without tracking its users. Can you imagine how ineffective ads will be and how little revenue facebook will make? Also, if they monetized their services, facebook will have a hard time finding users buying their service!
So the real question is, if there is a social network as advanced as facebook that survive only by targeting random ads without tracking their data, HOW WILL IT SURVIVE?