Explanations aside, if in the slight chance it's workably better than ion thrusters for certain applications, that's great. If it turns out to be snake oil or a hoax, that would not be a huge surprise either.
The original was http://waitersonwheels.com, which I used in the 1990's. It started as a catalog-based service, which waiter.com knocked off and improved.
It's not a defensible business model unless there's some exclusivity agreements with restaurants on the menu. (too tasty to resist.)
If a patch can be made by upstream in good faith to addressa vuln before CRD, embargoing until after its users have had a reasonable chance to deploy it is a very good thing. If the upstream is not responsive, that's different. The point is not artificially creating fires and surprises unnecessarily, which put thousands or millions of systems at avoidable risk. Patches need to get out there as soon as possible when good faith is working and PoCs need to be released anyhow if upstream is unresponsive. This accountability will ensure that preventative, cooperative fixes are released as soon as possible with minimum damage. Because of a premature PoC were used to takedown life/safety or major business concerns, there will be additional fallout. Playing fast and loose and dismissing concerns of large-scale installed bases is not a strategy, it's either ignorance or hubris. Causing emergencies and putting people unnecessary risk is nearly always preventable bullshit. There are only a few cases where upstream developers are unable, incapable or unwilling to patch something in good faith that it should be released... And in some cases where the fix is tricky, there should be an occasional, mutually-agreed short deferment. Again, avoid unnecessary harm to users by applying common sense rather than unrealistic dogma "full disclosure right now, fuck everyone else."
Interesting, reminds me of the graffiti robot for some reason . [0] Would be a neat follow on project to rapidly "print" via an actual loom to weave an entire fabric panel as the display. The thread aspect is neat however it comes off as an e-ink shortcut. It's quite an engineering feat that the majority of it works reliably as it appears (only a few dead "pixel" of thousands).
I agree. I think there are two distinct usability issues to address: content size and font size. That is, how much real estate the virtual viewport occupies in proportion to the display AND the size of font relative to the reader's ability to read comfortably. The trick is sensible adjustments to style attributes to keep layout working properly on the vast majority of devices no matter the zoom level or default font size, within reason.
As a user example, when I load the HN front-page on an iOS device in portrait mode, I'm lazy and switch to rotate to landscape mode to see more without trimming edges and scrolling around. On most sites, I expect to be able to double-tap on a paragraph column to toggle maximize-fit-to-display-width mode and return regular all-content-on-display-width mode.
If some site prevents this, I will not buy their products or use their services, because it's a signal they don't care about usability and will inevitably waste people's time. That's a form of laziness and failure that should not be rewarded. There are usually competitors that want you to switch to their brand (except with govts). Those annoying jQuery Mobile one-sized-fits-all sites deployed by pharmacies, banks, govts and so on.
This implies that any public performance on a stage of Happy Birthday to You recorded or not, is subject to licensing fees or fines. This is bloody nuts. Enough is enough!
Public bathrooms in NE, BE, FR, GB are paid per use and far between. My mom has stories of jumping under the stalls if they didn't have the shilling, sixpence or whatever it was in the 60's. In LA, it's mostly systematic hatred targeting minorities and homeless people from completely necessary bodily functions... which is dumb to deny, because they'll do it 'round back for spite... the owner could so just be cool and ask everyone to promise (really) to not make a mess and keep it very clean so people feel slightly worse if they were to slob it up.
Also, every Starbucks in the U.S. seems to give out water or water with ice upon request. That's not the same as a community identity space and symbol of a water fountain or a Roman aqueduct with water endlessly flowing out of a hole in the wall (we're obviously not able to waste as much as in the past).
Perhaps the symbol of the commons replaced with nothing but apparent commercial options is what people are moral panicking about? Or is there (perhaps as a result of what follows) a popular, definite consumer mentality shift to eschewing anything free == not good, expensive == good?
Normally I'm not one for ad hominems but he comes off as a huge poser dbag. The only things missing were the duck grimace and Donald Trump pluging his 2016 campaign.
A nice way of saying the Greek govt was mostly Idiocracy (2006) incarnate. Sounds like there might be a leadership vacuum and hard, effective work ethic may not be appreciated (or it was a personality conflict).
One positive note: most organizations are culturally self-selecting. So if it didn't work out, that means he's freed up to land a better gig even if he could have made an larger impact if allowed, it's clear the leadership either blames him, feels they have irreconcilable differences or doesn't want him to succeed. It appears he gave it a good go, but perhaps insiders think otherwise. Reiterating the maxim of never burn bridges and always take the high road when leaving employment (and never gossiping/speak ill of anyone in an exit interview.)