Yeah. Someone made a good point: all those Chinese scientists and their supervisors and local government and local police and numerous agencies were actually acting to protect the US. Xi obviously has lost control of the Chinese government to secret US agents. Lol.
OK. Then why not any of those places become the innovation engine of the world? I heard people would become more creative and innovative under those circumstances.
"geneticists today rightly treat eugenics as a laughable proposition"? Really? This author is not qualified to speak for geneticists.
Dawkins: It’s one thing to deplore eugenics on ideological, political, moral grounds. It’s quite another to conclude that it wouldn’t work in practice. Of course it would. It works for cows, horses, pigs, dogs & roses. Why on earth wouldn’t it work for humans? Facts ignore ideology.
Crazy woke activitists like this author is not qualified to speak for science. They think if something is politically wrong must also be scientifically wrong. It is not.
Actually this event may also become a test of the validity of those measures / indicators. One may argue those measures / indicators are not setup for this purpose.
Something is wrong with the "Plots" tab. Two plots show different data points, without title, but comes with same legends. And the legend does not make much sense either. "Mainland China" and "Other Locations" make sense, but "Total Recovered" as the third group? I don't understand this.
This issue is not a "flaw". It's a root problem. We want to know the effect of permanent UBI, not of a temporary one, and we know (strongly suspect) the effect will be different.
Maybe the simple solution is that the researchers establish a dedicated
million dollar bank account for a participant and automatically withdraw $1000 for the participant every month.