If it worked, they'd study it to find out what the interaction was or if it was a metabolite that carried the action. Then they'd develop a targetted version of that drug, patent it, and cash in.
It doesn't work. So they haven't.
A good example is major clinical depression and ketamine.
Err no. The payments get settled at BoE at the end of the cycle. This would have caused double draw on their settling account. They would have had less money.
It really depends. I've put someone through a disciplinary before for a really expensive failed change. Not because they made the mistake but because they failed to do any sanity checks before hand or post-imp checks - they just bashed it in and walked away.
I'd never go this route with a geniune mistake as they are life's best lessons. But there is a difference between an honest mistake and a mistake that could have been easily avoided had process been followed.
The fact that crypto isn't even a thing with these sites tells you everything you need to know about the future of crypto.
It's a speculation-bubble and a circle-jerk all in one.
It has no future in retail or p2p payments. People need the safety nets the existing payment schemes, processors, banks, and regulators provide. See "push payment fraud" in my country (UK) as an example.
It will never be used as a general currency by the man on the street.
For example in the UK we have Direct Debits which are backed by the DD Guarantee. If a DD is wrong or fraudulent the bank must refund you without question and they initiate a DDIC (indemnity claim) against the creditor bank. This could not happen with Bitcoin.
Same for problems such as push-payment fraud - they are rolling out confirmation of payee to try to tackle this. How could Bitcoin be a viable payment method in it's current form when addresses are anonymous (in the context of PPF)?
The advice is actually for "serious" allergic reactions. There's a world of difference between hayfever and something life-threatening like nut allergies.
I have hay-fever and Asthma and you won't be able to stop me getting the vaccine. I see far more risk from COVID than the vaccine.
I have to question your motivations here. Your post is disingenuous at best.
I read an article about a large firm of lawyers removing gendered language from their pro-forma documents. The article claimed they were going to use AI to achieve this. It's not even worth pointing out what is the obvious method for this task.