The "Avoiding animation pollution" section has a few minor typos,
`transition: * 0.6s ease` won't work anyway, `*` is a selector, they're looking for a value of `all`. Omitting the transition property all together (i.e. `transition: 1s`) is what people often do but this is bad practice for the reasons they stated.
Also, for the CSS examples I believe they mean to set `.animated:hover` to `opacity: 1;` not 0.
I like the idea of using an SVG mask to make a transparent background on the jpg.
I'd add the NWS to that. I don't know of a better place to get weather information and forecasts than weather.gov. Perhaps it's just a lack of ads on the website compared to every other weather site.
This doesn't actually work, the value attribute of the input doesn't change as a user types something.
With that said, I still think there is a a big discovery yet to be made with browsers leaking users' history via the :visited selector. Only a few CSS properties can be set with it (all related to color). But if there was a way to detect the color difference or timing of the painting that would be a big deal.
Possibilities might be with mix-blend-mode, @property, or applying "slow" css properties like a blurry text-shadow dozens of times. I've played around with this a little but haven't found a crack yet.
They mention it in the article but we should really be calling this what it really is, 21st century eugenics.
It's not "changing who gets born and who doesn’t", it's killing the weak, the unwanted, the vulnerable.
It's saying that our lives have meaning and worth and dignity only so long as we are wanted and not a burden to others.
Few minds and opinions change on HN but I encourage anyone viewing this as a positive development of society to meet someone with down syndrome in person and ask if that person would be better off killed.
Adam posts a lot of good tips and tricks and is an expert in all things CSS. My criticism was more directed at the performance of the web.dev website which I'm sure is out of his control.
60 Minutes continues to show repeats of their glowing feature on them, how they're going to be the next big thing and how they're set to make hundreds of thousands of truckers unemployed.
I haven't watched the full thing again to see if they mention the company has since closed down or that basically everything that was promised in the report isn't coming true anytime soon, or ever.
https://bennettfeely.com/csspiechart/