Seems to be a weak pitch for an Israeli startup called Factify. Their new document type is also closed sourced which seems like an obvious showstopper for a ubiquitous global document replacement, especially in today's extremely heated and untrustworthy environment.
This author, like many others on this site, seem to imply that AI generates "good" code, but it absolutely does not---unless he's running some million dollar subscription model I'm unaware of. I've tested every AI using simple Javascript programs and they all produce erroneous spaghetti slop. I did discover that Claude produces sufficiently decent Haskell code. The point is that the iterative process requires you know the language because you're going to need to amend the code. Therefore vibe in the language you know. Anyone that suggests that AI can produce a solid application on its own is a fraud.
"This extension uses a fully embedded Neovim instance, no more half-complete Vim emulation!"
This article seems to compare an out-of-the-box vscode with a tailor made vim.config. I guarantee if he spent as much time configuring vscode as he did configuring vim he could establish equivalent environments. That vscode-neovim plugin alone (not vscode-vim) is likely sufficient.
Very likely the same way that targeted advertising is carried out, which most certainly does occur. Also, 4chan has a history with law enforcement, including the FBI, and the military. Moreover multiple studies have been carried out by academia including by the Israeli military in regard to demographics. The point is that an entity like Palantir could be applied to reduce hate speech and violence. Rather than serve an ad it uses AI to generate a post that is humorous yet very curated in an intrusive insidious fashion.
If I ask Grok about anything that occurred this morning, he immediately starts reading and researching in real time. "Summarize what Leavitt said this morning." "Tell me what's new in python 3.14." Etc.. What do you mean by "cutoff", it seems unlikely that Claude is that limited.
My blog is private, offline, and only kept on my personal local computer therefore the only way for "people" to read it is according to an illegal criminal way. Moreover, in the US it would be a felony. I'm currently using Hugo.
An obvious maxim. However, the full statement is "Privacy empowers YOU, but surveillance weakens YOU." Thus, to the enemy of the people, surveillance is a great weapon. Enemies of the people are typically an elite ruling class. To me, surveillance is generally applied to oppress opportunity, e.g. contemporary cancel culture, bad jacketing, or blacklisting.