And like most security measures, humans are the weak link. The scanning system did mark the barcode as already used/invalid, but the staff assumed it was a glitch and let them on.
I own one, and it works just like an airtag and appears in the find my app. It doesn't have precision feature but everything else works(like using the apple/iphone network to find it)
In two places. The web client takes _minutes_ to load the artist page. It's slow enough that I get the Firefox warning stating that the page is slowing down Firefox. The web client (seemingly) doesn't load the song/tracklist in chunks and attempts to load every song at once(at least on the artist page).
The second issue isn't specifically a "Navidrome" problem, but every iOS and Mac desktop client I've used(and I've tried _every_ one that Navidrome lists on their site) attempts to load every song on load and basically becomes unusable.
I'm about two notches away from writing my own music streaming server. Navidrone is barely functional for me...and falls under software I hate, but there are no better options.
As someone currently running a Navidrome instance with 40k songs...yeah, I wouldn't wish that on anyone(horrible performance), but it is an option I suppose.
GDPR does not fix this situation. There are cut-outs in GDPR that allows companies to store data for longer. Financial/billing/taxes fall under that category.
Looks an interesting app and does solve a pain point I encounter semi-frequently.
I'm usually not one to comment on prices of applications, but $50/$100 for such a small utility is pretty steep. At 20 dollars I may even buy for it occasional use and not even think about it. At your prices I need to compare it to Affinity, kaleidoscope, littlesnitch and see if I derive a similar value from your application.
It's not. There's _no_ law that dictates battery size. 100Whr is the largest size you can take on airlines. Economically, no laptop manufacturer is going to make a laptop you can't take on a plane.
"Now, replace the 'White candidates only' with 'Australian residents only,' and you have a real example of thousands of modern job ads shared around the web every day."
That's an outrageous and insidious comparison to make. Nationality and ethnicity are two different things. Presumably, there are more than just white people in Australia. Job ads with country based limitations are primarily legal considerations. Hiring non-residents in _any_ country generally requires procedures that cost money or time, either in the process itself or hiring a third-party to delegate the process. Nation-based hiring is not racial prejudice.
Now, an analysis of the reasoning why countries(read: not companies) create their immigration policies would be worth an article. But, that's an orthogonal issue.
I understand that this blog article is simply an ad/SEO marketing article. But your point could be made without such statements. It's such an incredulous thing to imply.
This is incorrect information. H1B "Status" and H1B "Visa" are two separate things.
A common immigration path is F1(Student) -> OPT -> H1B Status. If the person was already in the US(because they're going to a US college) then they would be given H1B status(read: no visa). Getting a H1B visa from the US consulate would be required IFF they: 1) Weren't already in the US, 2) Need to leave and reenter the US.
If the person is _already_ in the US when they receive H1B Status then they don't need to receive a visa. Not having a visa is not illegal or affect work status. A visa simply allows ingress and egress in/out of the country and does not confer work authorization(which is what an H1b "Status" does).
Source: I've gone through this process, and from a family of attorneys.