NSA.gov Site Defacement(praetorianprefect.com)
praetorianprefect.com
NSA.gov Site Defacement
http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2009/10/nsa-gov-site-defacement/
2 comments
1 or 2 months later an offer of employment (to a Canadian!) arrived at his doorstep.
This is a standard way to catch people who do this type of stuff. Once he sets foot on American soil, he would be arrested. You actually have to be pretty dense to fall for it. ~99% of employment at the CIA requires some form of security clearance, which in turn requires you to be a US citizen.
This is a standard way to catch people who do this type of stuff. Once he sets foot on American soil, he would be arrested. You actually have to be pretty dense to fall for it. ~99% of employment at the CIA requires some form of security clearance, which in turn requires you to be a US citizen.
While I see the point, I'm not sure I believe you that easily. Not all clearance forms require you to be a citizen (besides there must be some way to cooperate with companies from other countries). Why are you sure he would get arrested? Has there been a documented case of something like that happening before? Isn't the offer of employment an official document that's legally forcing to hire someone if they accept? (not sure how do those work in US)
What you wrote is just a bit unlikely. If US can force a UK citizen and a "hacker" (NASA case) to be transported to US for the trial even after many appeals, why would it be a problem with Canada?
What you wrote is just a bit unlikely. If US can force a UK citizen and a "hacker" (NASA case) to be transported to US for the trial even after many appeals, why would it be a problem with Canada?
Here's a case of Valve coordinating with the FBI, attempting to do what I described: http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/11/13/the-job-is-a-lie-va.... As for why extradition is not used, the lure is far quicker and much cheaper. The hacker you mention is a perfect example. "The order to extradite McKinnon was approved by the U.K. government in July 2006, but his legal team continued to challenge the order, holding up his transfer." [1] That's over three years ago. That's just when the approval went through mind you. He was indicted in the US in 2002.
Also, I'm fairly certain you are incorrect about security clearances (at least for Confidential, Secret, and Top Secret). Even dual citizens have to shred their extra passport and renounce their additional citizenship. The FBI website mentions that for Top Secret, citizenship is verified through investigation: "For a Top Secret security clearance, the background investigation includes additional record checks which can verify citizenship...." [2] If you're working at an intelligence agency like the CIA, Top Secret is pretty much required.
[1] http://www.pcworld.com/article/173397/uks_high_court_rejects...
[2] http://www.fbi.gov/clearance/securityclearance.htm
Also, I'm fairly certain you are incorrect about security clearances (at least for Confidential, Secret, and Top Secret). Even dual citizens have to shred their extra passport and renounce their additional citizenship. The FBI website mentions that for Top Secret, citizenship is verified through investigation: "For a Top Secret security clearance, the background investigation includes additional record checks which can verify citizenship...." [2] If you're working at an intelligence agency like the CIA, Top Secret is pretty much required.
[1] http://www.pcworld.com/article/173397/uks_high_court_rejects...
[2] http://www.fbi.gov/clearance/securityclearance.htm
I would tend to believe that some significant portion of CIA tasks would require (or at least largely benefit from) some form of security clearance elsewhere in the world, which in turn would require (or at least largely benefit from) the said cleared person being a national from the country in question.
Otherwise I believe you are right in most cases. One would have to be rather naive to simply accept such an offer blindly.
Otherwise I believe you are right in most cases. One would have to be rather naive to simply accept such an offer blindly.
That is extremely interesting! I don't think they have him on any terrorism list though. He traveled to New York recently without any fuss.
Yikes, seems like things could easily turn out different if that email is directed to the wrong person or misunderstood.
Do you know how he encrypted his email?
I'm guessing here, but it was probably something like:
"The attached encrypted word doc exposes an IT security flaw of one of your systems. It is weakly encrypted and should be easy for you to break."
Or he could have just emailed them the document and called them to tell them the password.
Or he could have just emailed them the document and called them to tell them the password.
Defacement of a public portion of the NSA's site is just going to land you in a world of hurt, even if you are in a far off country.