MinimaLT: Minimal-latency Networking Through Better Security (2013) [pdf](cr.yp.to)
cr.yp.to
MinimaLT: Minimal-latency Networking Through Better Security (2013) [pdf]
http://cr.yp.to/tcpip/minimalt-20131031.pdf
3 comments
Wasn't there research showing that in channels mixed with tcp traffic , high tcp traffic can effectively block MinimaLT traffic, effectively creating DoS?
This sounds great. A year later, where's the code?
Looks like it will be here: http://www.ethos-os.org/
@JonSolworth (https://twitter.com/jonsolworth) occasionally posts progress updates.
@JonSolworth (https://twitter.com/jonsolworth) occasionally posts progress updates.
>Whether strangers or anonymous users are allowed is left to the underlying system's authorization policy.
While DoS protection is nice, I would hate to encourage networking that forces client authentication. Imagine if Google/Facebook/etc could effectively enforce a real name policy.
While DoS protection is nice, I would hate to encourage networking that forces client authentication. Imagine if Google/Facebook/etc could effectively enforce a real name policy.
That doesn't matter. You can generate a new Curve25519 identity key per connection.