Poll: OAuth 1.0a or OAuth 2.0 in a Docker container?
2 comments
Why not both?
Big companies may prefer 1.0a for security and startups OAuth2.0 for flexibility about permissions and growth with easier integration by partners
I agree with this. For a Docker container to be valuable to companies (i.e. willing to pay money for it, I assume that's the goal), it should support both.
How are you planning to integrate the Docker container with the business authentication/authorization? LDAP?
How are you planning to integrate the Docker container with the business authentication/authorization? LDAP?
OAuth1's /ridiculously/ complex.
OAuth2 fits in a tweet: get a login URL, user visits it, redirects back to you with an auth code, swap it for an access token.
Out of the major players:
- Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Instagram uses OAuth2.
- Only Twitter uses OAuth 1.
OAuth2 fits in a tweet: get a login URL, user visits it, redirects back to you with an auth code, swap it for an access token.
Out of the major players:
- Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Instagram uses OAuth2.
- Only Twitter uses OAuth 1.
What would you prefer for your apps and why: OAuth 1.0a, OAuth 2.0 or some other protocol?
If you want some other protocol, please add it in the comments
Disclosure : I'm the creator of the open source daemon oauthd and founder of oauth.io.