Grounds for Jury Misconduct in Apple v Samsung Patent Trial(macobserver.com)
macobserver.com
Grounds for Jury Misconduct in Apple v Samsung Patent Trial
http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/grounds_for_jury_misconduct_in_apple_v_samsung_patent_trial/
1 comments
> After some research, and speaking with attorneys, I think there may be a problem with the way the verdict was decided.
That's exactly what this article is saying.
That's exactly what this article is saying.
Ha, I know, I wrote the article. I think I didn't correctly articulate my first comment. What I meant to say was something like "I don't think there's any way to overlook this, and that's a problem" because many of media outlets covering the trial have not even mentioned it.
I just imagine a bunch of Apple legal team members watching the foreman's interviews and all of them simultaneously face-palming. It probably won't cost Apple the verdict, but it will cost them more time and money on appeal.
I just imagine a bunch of Apple legal team members watching the foreman's interviews and all of them simultaneously face-palming. It probably won't cost Apple the verdict, but it will cost them more time and money on appeal.
After some research, and speaking with attorneys, I think there may be a problem with the way the verdict was decided. Not that I'm trying to make a judgment on who should have won, but it seems that this foreman was a bit too excited by his role and the information he claims to possess.
Any thoughts?