Relax with CouchDB - First Three Chapters for Feedback(books.couchdb.org)
books.couchdb.org
Relax with CouchDB - First Three Chapters for Feedback
http://books.couchdb.org/relax/
4 comments
yeah I think I must be missing the "domain" of problem that this is a solution for? If you have relatively non-relational static (more read than updated) data why do you need this to store it? Wouldn't flat files or berkeley db type solutions fit the bill?
Also I am not questioning the validity of the project - more hoping that an advocate can give an example of a foot that this show fits snugly.
Also I am not questioning the validity of the project - more hoping that an advocate can give an example of a foot that this show fits snugly.
Hey David,
We would be interested in having your feedback on the official mailing list where we could discuss your concerns. The problem with the first two chapters is that we're trying to address the needs of a wide range of readers. We wanted to cover the major differences between CouchDB and an RDMS from “10,000” feet.
Again, thanks for the feedback - we would love to have you on the mailing list.
Noah
We would be interested in having your feedback on the official mailing list where we could discuss your concerns. The problem with the first two chapters is that we're trying to address the needs of a wide range of readers. We wanted to cover the major differences between CouchDB and an RDMS from “10,000” feet.
Again, thanks for the feedback - we would love to have you on the mailing list.
Noah
Yeah I'm also not really impressed with this first draft. The first 2 chapters seemed more about telling me why rdbms is better. It's a shame too because CouchDB has a lot of potential that this book isn't doing it credit for. One of the guys working on it gave a really good interview on Twit back in April. Look at twit.tv under FLOSS from earlier this year.
From that perspective this document is borderline incoherent. The authors don't know what a relational database is.