The question is fundamentally flawed, in that "data structure" is a concept used by programmers to communicate with computers (or between programmers).
A comparable question would be wondering whether the computer you are using right now, at this point in time, is inside a for loop, or a while loop, or it's just using tail recursion.
Sure some cognitive scientist can make my point more explicit, sorry that all I can only offer is a counterexample.
The first paragraph describes a common structure of the articles in The Economist, which goes a long way towards explaining why it is so satisfying to read.
The physorg article mixes up, at first, the nature/nurture question and the cross-modality of perception question (whether internal representations good for tactile perception are also good for visual perception). Those are very different fundamental questions.
http://clipperz.com rocks in terms of usability, convenience, and a sense of security (which might be false: here is a call for criticism).
It is open source, portable (runs in Javascript), works on and offline and well designed. You can log in using a master passphrase, or a one-time password.
I read "social scam" in the HN entry. I only realised it was "social cam" when I actually clicked on the link (after I read a few of the top-ranked comments).
You could bootstrap Zombal as a "payment system" for scientific reviews.
Get in touch with the organisers of a national-level scientific conference. They could offer reviewers the option of getting Zombal credits for their (currently unpaid) work. Reviews are automatically meta-reviewed (by the acceptance), you could use that information.
If you do so, please make it fully automatic: conference review websites are already painful to use.
You could also use the information that the reviewers provide about themselves.
There you have lots of people who might be keen on getting some sort of recognition for their currently unpaid work.
I am considering that, but shutting down during off hours so as not to run into a bill of >$200 a year (I'm not a new customer).
I am curious about people's experiences with using them for that purpose.
I found using EC2's non-micro instances somehow inconvenient because boot times seemed to be too long for casual use, plus I had to pay extra for a permanent IP. Maybe I'm too lazy, or perhaps the micro instances are more suitable for that purpose?
For the Airbus style of jobs perhaps you should consider Hamburg (similar costs, much smaller) because there you could find... Airbus. Not so international atmosphere, though, although the harbour is major local industry.
An added bonus is the local beach over the Elba :-)
> I want dialogue! I want mutual reinforcement! I want to comment and be commented upon! I want community, in other words.
Long rant, but pleasant read.
This thought sprung up: On-demand reinforcement, the kind that one would get just by asking for it, makes us dumb, like kids lavished with "positive feedback". But, as a tool that helps us align our goals with our motivations, when nurtured in a community, could deal with the causes of procrastination.
A comparable question would be wondering whether the computer you are using right now, at this point in time, is inside a for loop, or a while loop, or it's just using tail recursion.
Sure some cognitive scientist can make my point more explicit, sorry that all I can only offer is a counterexample.