> Just 2% of its employees are black, 4% Hispanic, and 35% Asian.
Since Asians are at most 4% of the US population, that means they're extremely overrepresented at Google (and other tech companies), by almost ten times their proportion of the population at large. Yet we still see articles like this one highlighting the Asianness of their subjects as if it amplifies their victim status, subtly blaming whites for the underrepresented blacks and Hispanics that overrepresented Asians have crowded out, and treats as legitimate their complaint that while indeed horribly overrepresented as employees at these companies, they aren't just as horribly overrepresented in executive positions.
And the left still wonders why white racial identity politics and advocacy is now a thing.
> Apparently, millions of people (10% in a large region and 0.5% globally) are direct descendants of Genghis Khan, one of the worlds greatest conquerors - and also one of the most prolific breeders[1].
You mean one of the most prolific rapists. But since he was a "person of color" (yellow) and many of his victims were white, I doubt his statues will be toppled any time soon.
Since Asians are at most 4% of the US population, that means they're extremely overrepresented at Google (and other tech companies), by almost ten times their proportion of the population at large. Yet we still see articles like this one highlighting the Asianness of their subjects as if it amplifies their victim status, subtly blaming whites for the underrepresented blacks and Hispanics that overrepresented Asians have crowded out, and treats as legitimate their complaint that while indeed horribly overrepresented as employees at these companies, they aren't just as horribly overrepresented in executive positions.
And the left still wonders why white racial identity politics and advocacy is now a thing.