Not the kind of tism that hurts people, but the kind of tism that the US government engages in: using fear to control the population and influence opinion ("We need these percautions or planes will be jacked").
Basically, if the government doesn't brand you a tist, you aren't a threat to the status quo and they aren't scared of you changing anything. If you aren't called a tist you've failed. To win the game you have to play the game.
What we need is to hurt the bottom line of the biggest tax contributors, and we need to make it clear why their bottom line is receding (complicity with data sniffing).
Not the kind of tism that hurts people, but the kind of tism that the US government engages in: using fear to control the population and influence opinion ("We need these percautions or planes will be jacked").
Basically, if the government doesn't brand you a tist, you aren't a threat to the status quo and they aren't scared of you changing anything. If you aren't called a tist you've failed. To win the game you have to play the game.
What we need is to hurt the bottom line of the biggest tax contributors, and we need to make it clear why their bottom line is receding (complicity with data sniffing).