I've done whiteboard only interviews, as well as shared doc/coderpad only, and I find both limiting. When thinking about the problem, it's great to have a whiteboard to sketch examples etc, but writing code is much easier with a text editor.
Recently I interviewed at Google, and they had no problem fulfilling my request to do both: sketch the solution approach on whiteboard and then write the code with a laptop.
I find it strange you mention transfer learning, since one of the reasons neural networks are so popular are because they tend to excel at it. Adapting (i.e. fine-tuning) networks trained on a task with a lot of data (e.g. image classification on ImageNet) to different tasks, such as image segmentation, has proven a very successful approach.
In your example, this would correspond to having the number x = 0 +-1 and then wanting to compute 1/x. If your number can potentially be zero, why would you want to use it as a divisor?
Hi, I'm one of the authors. That is correct in a strict sense, but we wanted to focus on the more 'creative' part of logos rather than the text.
GANs are known to struggle with high resolutions, but we note that we show higher resolution logos later in the paper (see page 12 and 15 e.g) which is trained on the smaller but higher-resolution version of our dataset.
In contrast to ImageNet, only the validation and test data were manually labeled. Impressively, on such data, an accuracy of ~95% (top5) is achieved by the winning solution this year.
Another issue is that browsers do not display the non-secure http:// prefix in the url bar (which should probably be red and striked through).
As a PoC, I bought the domain https.is, and now I can construct urls like https.is//accounts.google.com - which can look convincing when glimpsed over.
Well, if a large corporation infringes on your patent, in theory your patent is now valuable to its competitors as a "weapon" for their "patent arsenal".
I would have thought the same. However instead of adding random latency, one could have a buffer, that only allows a couple of fixed output rates (eg, 150,160,...,300 CPM), when typing.
This would probably be quite annoying to type on though :-)
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/authors/ARbTQlRLRjE/matthe...