This guy seems to have had a reputation of harassment behaviour going back more than a decade among guy groups on a blog forum ran by two of the Ushahidi board members (D Kobia and Juliana Rotich). This means that, by the time they were appointing him as CEO of Ushahidi they were well aware of his behaviour. By then, they had also been alerted of his behaviour within Ushahidi. What would be the explanation for that?
1. If you think that there is a good reason for why a CEO would be allowed at the helm following allegations of sexual misconduct, and why two months (or more) is a reasonable timeframe to handles such a matter, please walk us through your reasoning. 2. All predators have mothers. Never seemed to stop them. Many predators have wives and daughters. Never seemed to stop them. Many defenders of predators have wives and daughters, and sometimes are women. Did not stop them. From all accounts, there have been multiple opportunities for Ushahidi board to do the right thing. Just like in San Francisco, sometimes it requires the public to drive a matter to conclusion.