First of all, under paga you simply file to the lwda the grievances of the employer and they decide if they want to do the work of investigation or just hire you, at 25% when any lawyer will charge you 33-40%, to investigate for them.
Of course the defense would call it the 'sue your boss' law because it is only used when your boss breaks the law and you are forced to sue them in order to utilise the legal system to ensure compliance of the legal code.
This is a labor dispute, the entire relationship between the parties is based on money, if an employer has been stealing income of course money is going to be attached to the concept of justice.
> better solutions
Better solutions to what? Employers breaking the laws? What can you suggest? Asking that question is what created the labor code.
> the damage they do is not visible till later where it is already huge.
First of all, under paga you simply file to the lwda the grievances of the employer and they decide if they want to do the work of investigation or just hire you, at 25% when any lawyer will charge you 33-40%, to investigate for them.
Of course the defense would call it the 'sue your boss' law because it is only used when your boss breaks the law and you are forced to sue them in order to utilise the legal system to ensure compliance of the legal code.
This is a labor dispute, the entire relationship between the parties is based on money, if an employer has been stealing income of course money is going to be attached to the concept of justice.
> better solutions
Better solutions to what? Employers breaking the laws? What can you suggest? Asking that question is what created the labor code.
> the damage they do is not visible till later where it is already huge.
Can you elaborate on what you meant by this?