"I think that is the beauty of writing, the raw , unedited emotions of the person behind every words either for entertainment or educational purposes, is what makes it special"
- the article, clearly expressing the intent of its own mistakes and contextualizing them in the era of LLM-borne "perfect" text
The best analogy of zk-proofs I've heard is to suppose you have found Waldo in "Where's Waldo," and want to prove that you have done this without revealing the location.
You could take a piece of paper (much larger than the picture/book), and cut out a waldo-shaped hole it and position the paper such that he is shown in the hole. Then, when you show it to the challenger, they know that you have found him without you revealing where he is.
Worth mentioning that this is the same design company that blew $35MM on a terrible redesign of Tropicana Orange Juice, which they reverted back within a couple days (but kept the mock orange cap)
A funny parody song of this presentation by the legendary Neil Cicierega (potter puppet pals, ultimate battle of ultimate destiny, brodyquest, mouth sounds, etc…)
I don't think the article made this differentiation specifically, but I don't see this as blaming technology, but ad-driven companies engineering skinner boxes. It is well understood that advertising companies wreak havoc on children's health (tobacco, body image, sugar, etc). We should hold these companies accountable.
While there were definitely lax restrictions here, there are more factors here (societal pressure, both cultural and literal; the article indicated that study groups and other activities were coordinated solely on social media) that affect one's proneness to phone addiction.
In addition, in the article linked above (and others), parenting is not _the_ bellwether preventative in terms of phone addiction - there are psychological factors, environmental factors, etc.
In addition, there are societal variations across gender that are documented as having an affect on proneness to phone addiction.
Don't let your individual experience override the reality of the situation. This is an issue that is going to require extensive research and potentially regulation.
There is a multi-billion dollar concerted effort by the largest companies in the world to get an iron grip on the attention of children at a level of granularity never before seen - don't pretend like that isn't a novel cultural force that should be reckoned with.
"What a load of shit", "all these problems are your fault."
Really? This comment just seems like ego-driven parental grandstanding rather than an actual attempt to understand how the first generation born into the era of smartphones and all-the-time internet access might have difficulty negotiating a healthy psyche against a multi-billions dollar oligarchy of companies intentionally seeking to monetize their attention.
Congratulations, your son doesn't seem addicted to their ipod. Cool anecdote; here's actual data about wether or not parental control of phone use has much of an affect on phone addiction (it doesn't):
https://journals.lww.com/jan/fulltext/2018/04000/does_parent...
Hi! I'm a DevOps Engineer and Solutions Architect specializing in container orchestration and designing for scale. Big Linux nerd and open-source advocate.
Interesting that they show a usecase involving Vizceral (their traffic visualizer, "intuition engineering"), despite them publicly abandoning the project. Hope this implies they are working on releasing it formally!
1. Every system has vulnerabilities. You can defend against them.
2. Any improperly configured system can be abused. In particular, the exploit you linked can be completely stopped with a litany of ways. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16030107
Your argument going from "containers are unfit for production, you'll mature out of them one day" to "here's a small, preventable vulnerability" seems more like a security non-sequiter than an actual argument against containerization.
Further, claiming containers are not production ready is empirically and literally negated by them used, in production, by the largest tech companies that have ever existed.
- the article, clearly expressing the intent of its own mistakes and contextualizing them in the era of LLM-borne "perfect" text