The idea for Re:Schedule from oberving how teams got work done at meetings. The information used in meetings is typically spread out between different tools and organized separately in each tool. In effect, the team's collaboration is distributed across multiple tools, making it inefficient.
Re:Schedule's approach is to bring the information into your calendar, so that it because not only a tool for organizing meeting logistics but also a meeting workspace.
Keller could be leaving for a whole slew of reasons. At AMD, he works for a company whose core competency is chip design - his strength. At Apple, he is just a cog in a giant wheel.
If he is instrumental in an AMD turnaround, he would have made a bigger impact than if he just pushing status quo at Apple.
I'm not sure this is a major impact for Apple. Firstly, I haven't seen anything groundbreaking come from Apple on the chip side. Secondly, there are plenty of talented people from AMD, Intel,HP, etc who would love to work for Apple. He can be replaced.
If a huge supply of platinum became available, its price would plummet. If one company figures out a way to mine asteroids, competition would soon follow. So they won't be able to control the supply and hence price of platinum. So even if they do succeed in mining and transporting the metal, they are not going to make anywhere near the money they're claiming.
Re:Schedule's approach is to bring the information into your calendar, so that it because not only a tool for organizing meeting logistics but also a meeting workspace.