Would you mind commenting on the development model for something like this? Do you do this on your own time or company sponsored time?
I mentioned in another comment that I have a framework along similar lines that has been developed within the company that I work for (Freescale Semiconductor) and I am looking for examples of other semiconductor-related open source projects that I can cite in discussions with management about releasing it.
If this was something that you developed within a company could you comment on how you went about open sourcing it?
Sorry to hi-jack this comment thread but I don't see many topics on h/ware design and whatever h/ware engineers are around here are likely to be reading this thread.
I'm a design/test engineer for Freescale Semiconductor and I definitely agree with this piece. In my group we have developed something that could be loosely described as 'Ruby on Rails for Semiconductors' and we use this to pre-compile our RTL where it gets marked up with ERB.
It was definitely interesting to read here that other companies embed a scripting language in their Verilog - aside from being conservative h/ware companies definitely don't tend to share such information as freely as their s/ware counterparts do!
So thanks to the OP and I will definitely be keeping an eye on his blog.
Anyway with our tool, which we call RGen, we have our design team maintain Ruby models of the h/ware modules, this contains all meta-data about what makes each design unique - feature availability, bug presence, register and memory map information, etc. The marked up RTL can then be compiled against the different design models to generate derivative specific designs - this generally provides a much more structured and powerful approach to design management than anything offered by native Verilog.
What's really neat though is that this meta-data lives in what we call an RGen plugin (kind of like a Ruby gem) and so we can plug these models into downstream environments to generate design-specific documentation, test patterns, test program, bench code, etc. This means that all IP that is dependent on a design can be generated against a design-owned description of it which is very light weight and whihc doesn't require introducing a massive Verilog/testbench dependency into downstream environments.
In terms of test the framework provides Ruby APIs to generate pattern and test programs and basically wraps the ATE test platform in the same way as Rails' ActiveRecord wraps a database - so it provides a credible way to maintain your test IP in a way that is vendor-independent.
Now I feel that other companies are probably solving these problems in their own way, and particularly where test engineering is concerned all of the power currently lies with the vendors who have no incentive to drive standardization and to make it easy for companies to switch platforms.
This is fueled by h/ware companies' general mindset of not sharing and collaborating across company boundaries.
Myself and all of the key RGen developers would like to make it open source and we are currently having these discussions with our management team, however as you might imagine the idea of this does not come easy to the semiconductor establishment and it will take quite some convincing to get a go ahead for it.
The biggest spectre is the concern that we release it and one of our competitors takes it, get's an advantage, continues to develop it internally and never gives back to the community.
I think we can assume that this will almost certainly happen in some cases, but it would help if I could get an idea if companies are out there that would in principle agree to supporting such a development model - basically the idea is that all of our source code and documentation development would move into the open where it would be run like Rails or one of the other main web s/ware frameworks and over time the core team would evolve to contain engineers from outside of Freescale.
So if any h/ware engineers are reading this, does this sound like something you can imagine using and more importantly contribute to?
If so would you mind disclosing who you work for?
Also if anyone knows of any large open source projects in the semi-conductor space that I could cite as examples to my management please provide details.
Actually its fine for streaming HD movies too. I have my home server set up from a Pi exactly like this and it is fine. I have mine streaming video via mediatomb and I have never had a hiccup once, even with 1080p video.
Sure maybe transferring files to/from it is not the fastest but I find it perfectly acceptable (say a minute or so to transfer a 300MB file) and as the OP says I don't feel bad about leaving it running 24/7.
Printer serving is one thing I have not been able to transfer from my old server, seems like the Pi is not that well supported for printer drivers, but I do expect that will be resolved soon by people smarter than me.
Would you mind commenting on the development model for something like this? Do you do this on your own time or company sponsored time?
I mentioned in another comment that I have a framework along similar lines that has been developed within the company that I work for (Freescale Semiconductor) and I am looking for examples of other semiconductor-related open source projects that I can cite in discussions with management about releasing it.
If this was something that you developed within a company could you comment on how you went about open sourcing it?