Whoa, whoa, whao. QT is superior to Tk because of network abstractions? Hello, Tk is part of Tcl, which has a socket layer so sophisticated that its embedded into Cisco routers.
Let's keep the discussion between QT people who actually KNOW Tcl/Tk and Tcl/Tk people who actually KNOW QT
Not to mention that Tcl has Unicode in the core, has had Unicode in the core for at least 8 years, and the long and short is that EVERY string operation is Unicode aware.
You can have unicode procedure names, if that was your fancy.
Let's keep the discussion between QT people who actually KNOW Tcl/Tk and Tcl/Tk people who actually KNOW QT