bubtksins·10 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss> React has been around for a while, but it is still only a library. Angular 1 and 2 are frameworks.What does this even mean. Angular is also 'only a library'.> As with Angular 1, Angular 2 aims to be opinionated, so it should be clearer how to do things than with React.'Should' and 'is' are different things, angular 1 was a complete mess. React is quite clean and straightforward.> Especially now with the move to components, Angular should be easier do more with, without as much confusion.Why? You don't give a reason of why this would be easier than with React.> And Angular 2 is much faster, if you do it right, which was one of the reasons Angular 1 was left for React.We are comparing Angular 2 with React not sure how 'Angular 2 might be better than Angular 1' is an argument against React.> React is fine for what it is. It's somewhat "matured" for a few years and is not a bad decision if you go with it.It's a much better decision than Angular 1 or Angular 2.
bubtksins·10 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss> In general Java and C# programmers like it.Why? What are you basing this on?> It is made by Google (perceived as more "mature", business like) rather than Facebook (young kids).By who? React is more mature than angular 2 and angular 1 is crap.> It takes a lot of inspiration from server side development with its dependency injection and general terminology.I'm not sure how this is a good thing even if true.> And TypeScript is very similar to Java and C#.TypeScript can be used with React.
What does this even mean. Angular is also 'only a library'.
> As with Angular 1, Angular 2 aims to be opinionated, so it should be clearer how to do things than with React.
'Should' and 'is' are different things, angular 1 was a complete mess. React is quite clean and straightforward.
> Especially now with the move to components, Angular should be easier do more with, without as much confusion.
Why? You don't give a reason of why this would be easier than with React.
> And Angular 2 is much faster, if you do it right, which was one of the reasons Angular 1 was left for React.
We are comparing Angular 2 with React not sure how 'Angular 2 might be better than Angular 1' is an argument against React.
> React is fine for what it is. It's somewhat "matured" for a few years and is not a bad decision if you go with it.
It's a much better decision than Angular 1 or Angular 2.