Hi kingkongjaffa,
Thanks for your honest feedback. The CTO exists. His name is Linus and he is one of the best coders I ever met. But he is also very business savvy. You are totally correct that we are validating what customers really need right now. In the past, we built products without first finding out if customers really want to them. I am very sorry if you feel that I am lying. I just want to build something with Linus that helps people. But thanks again for the honest feedback!
Kind regards,
Bastian
Hi Leros,
Thank you for your input - much appreciated! We are small team and I need to demonstrate to my CTO that customers will buy the tool. But it is super interesting that the tool we are developing is about decision making and convincing others - just what you emphasised!
Kind regards,
Bastian
Good point, elefantastisch. Culture is a huge success driver. We think it is also about repeat, repeat and repeat the right things to achieve a great culture. And technology can help people not to forget to repeat. What do you think?
Thank you igetspam! We will contact you asap. Change-advisory boards is what we had in mind when we separated between expert input and decision making. We create the agenda for a meeting robotically only if the decision makers cannot agree asynchronically. Looking forward to exchanging thoughts with you!
Hi greensoap, you are correct that Amazon patent application is not GRANTED as of yet. If there is a B at the end of the document number, it is GRANTED.
Good point, sumtechguy! I agree limiting numbers might not really help. However, giving startups the tools to understand the patent game might help a lot. What do you think?
Hi have_faith, Great question! That's one of the reasons we built GoodIP IQ: It can give everyone insights into the secret patent universe. And you are correct: Does it really make sense to have so many patents? How can startups deal with 100,000 patents just at Microsoft?