I can't work out whether this is a criticism of a corporate development culture (equally applicable to other tech stacks and legacy + reality of corporate world), or a "Microsoft is bad" argument, or possibly an ad hominem "only morons do MS, do you want to work with morons?" style argument...
Frankly I don't like the level of generalisation and apparent prejudice, and although I respect one's right to hold such an opinion, I think the conclusions of the article are wrong.
Frankly I don't like the level of generalisation and apparent prejudice, and although I respect one's right to hold such an opinion, I think the conclusions of the article are wrong.