I don't think poker is good for people either. The goal of poker is to win, taking money from other players by exploiting their weaknesses. It's a training ground to become ruthless, unempathetic, and deceptive.
Humbled to see the new official timeline of physics: Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, and now... Grok in 2025 claiming a single bit-flip explains life, the universe, and everything. What a time to be alive.
Software development is rarely a solo activity. You will need to communicate with other developers, product managers, designers, and non-technical stakeholders.
The "Participatory Interface Theory" is not a scientific theory. It is a work of science fiction masquerading as physics. It uses the following techniques to create an illusion of credibility:
Poetic Language: Replaces rigorous explanation with evocative metaphors.
Jargon Salad: Mixes terms from physics, computer science, and philosophy to sound profound.
Reverse-Engineering: Builds a complex model designed to reproduce a known anomaly (MOND) and presents this as a success.
The "One Falsifiable Prediction" Gambit: Creates a single, specific (but logically weak) prediction to gain the appearance of being scientific, while ignoring a mountain of contradictory evidence.
While the vision it presents is beautiful and thought-provoking, it has no demonstrable connection to reality.
I built my own recurring task manager, Perennial Task, to overcome the limitations I faced with TaskWarrior. Both are open source, so it's not something I was paying for.
Recently I've been working on a project I call term-to-svg. It's a command-line tool that converts terminal session recordings into animated SVG images.
PlotBranch is a side project of mine generating branching stories using GPT4. You may run into a generation screen if you request a page nobody has viewed before.
"The Paradoxical Quest" is the most popular story, but there are more to choose from on the homepage if you are interested.
My site is mainly for my own entertainment, and I've only been contacted a handful of times with nearly 20 years running it.
It is probably helpful to present a competent image when job searching. It shows you can develop and run a site, and that you have interests of your own.
Since experimenting with the GPT models I do notice when posts and articles seem to have used generated content, but I can't identify what it is that gives me this feeling. Maybe it is just a feeling.
When using the models, I find the content generated frequently must be edited to be useful. Presumably if it doesn't wander off or repeat itself too much, there is a human in the loop guiding the generation. Take it as seriously as you would any anonymous post on the Internet.
Fact check important stuff by seeking reputable sources. Treat the rest as entertainment. Even if it is possible to detect, just because text is generated does not mean it's incorrect.
I imagine given the way text is generated using probabilities, it can in theory be detected when stretches of text are using high probability words in sequence. I'm not aware of any tools that do this at the moment though.