> Conversely Adsense sells ads based on "targeted users". Which means your original site is pretty useless to Adsense.
But how is the updated site any better? It surely must be, since it made it past the review, right? The whole post just shows how ridiculous and flawed the review process is and what it leads to.
Seems like the point of this article missed a lot of people entirely, since they are so fixated on consumer inkjet printers. That's a very specific case of inkjet printing, but inkjet technology is way more than that.
For example continuous inkjet printers are used to label packages of many items you buy every day. There's also research about inkjet printing wearable electronics etc. None of which has a lot to do with HP.
We just ended up buying /28 subnet, because the whole v6 to v4 experience was too frustrating and would've probably cost more to solve all the issues (or hire someone who knew how to set it up properly) than to buy the subnet.
We ordered a new root server a few days before this, but are trying to primarily use IPv6 anyway. However the more I try to set things up, the more painful it becomes, with services like Github not being entirely available on IPv6, various ISPs not supporting IPv6 at all, so service proxying is needed etc.
Is there any best-practice for IPv6 VM host setup? I found the IPv6 First Guide [0], but I'm not entirely happy with the bridged networking to VMs being used.
Well, if you have virtuals running on your dedicated server, you're probably going to need more IPs anyway and IPv4 subnets now cost a small fortune on Hetzner, while IPv6 is free and you get a whole /64 subnet.
I used Swiftkey for a few years and thought it couldn't get better... until I found Fleksy.
The autocompletion is just superb and nowhere near anything I tried before. It's made for typing without looking or worrying about hitting the right keys, so if you're not really comfortable with Swiftkey-like typing, you might wanna give it a try.
To be honest, I don't see any reason not to use Flutter if you want to make a cross-platform app these days. Any other cross-platform framework I tried seemed somehow lacking, slow, unpleasant to use etc.
How so, I had nothing but issues when trying to deploy cross-platform Java because of the Java ecosystem itself being bad compared to C# or Golang where you just compile stuff and run it.
I don't see how it would be too short a notice for current CentOS users really. At least for majority of users running CentOS in their production systems and relying on a long-term support. It's not like they just go and trash their production setup the very moment its running distro lifespan is shortened. I'd expect the opposite actually, since you're looking for something well supported.
Huh? The problem isn't that the developer itself is trying to cover his misbehavior, but the fact that the developer can get banned for something out of his control.
I'm wondering if that's going to cut it though, since target audience for embedded rust isn't someone who wants to play with his Arduino, but people who write real world applications and are fed and tired of C/C++.
Unfortunately Simple Tab Groups (or maybe some internal feature it uses, probably hidden tabs) somehow leak resources and end up eating all the RAM for me.
The end of Panorama (or Tab Groups as known nowdays) was a disaster for me, as I don't hesitate having over 3k tabs open.
But how is the updated site any better? It surely must be, since it made it past the review, right? The whole post just shows how ridiculous and flawed the review process is and what it leads to.