Yes, if you are a CALIFORNIA NOTARY than you must follow their requirements. NOT if you are a Virginia Notary, then you follow Virginia Law, and your clients, wherever they are in the world, adhere to your Virginia requirements.
You are factually incorrect, and you are a big part of the problem here.
If you are a signer, you can go online now to signnow.com, sitting at Paul Graham's desk IN CALIFORNIA and legally notarize your document. It will be legally notarized by a Virginia Notary, and your notarization is 100% legal everywhere in the US.
"The service is not legal in any state except Virginia" just means the NOTARIES must be sitting in Virginia, again, the clients can be anywhere. Interstate commerce, and the National Association of Secretaries of State have proven support for accepting other state's notarizations.
Regarding identification, you should read the law, and try signnow's service since it does NOT rely on holding up an ID card for identity. The law requires, and signnow uses, out of wallet verification questions from a third party provider to verify identity. Anything else done is above and beyond the law, and is FAR ABOVE what currently occurs with the inconsistency of pen and paper notarizations.
You're not understanding the facts, online notarization IS legal in California... the notaries themselves can't be in California, but the signers can.
Signers can notarize from anywhere in the world, including California, since the notaries follow Virginia law. It's like how lenders and credit companies often use Utah law (but can lend elsewhere) or corporations incorporate in Delaware.
I can really see it going either way. I interpret this to show Facebook Ads are not a good way to get instant ROI. But there is a lot of value in having a large number of Likes because you can market to them each time you release a new product... in SignNow's case, they have 700 interested ears to begin each new adoption cycle now.
Hard to quantify the value of that. My opinion is that it's worth a lot for the early ears, but not if you are thinking short term only.
How can someone logically say they support freedom for some causes but not others... Sensationalism aside, you are not a supporter of freedom if you pick and choose which issues you think people should be free to choose for themselves.
Even someone disagreeing and not wanting to use bitcoin should at least support other's freedom to use it.
Inflation is one of the worst taxes of all because the government can hide how much of the value of the dollar they take from us!
Further, inflation is an increase in the money supply (ie printing new money). It is NOT an increase in price of goods, although it usually causes price increases as producers and consumers react.
Hey Sprinkles, I'm reading your comments and trying to figure out if you support freedom or not...
If the government is robbing its citizens, and forcing the poorest of them to pay a monstrous inflation tax, why is a FREE CHOICE alternative to fight government oppression a threat to you?
I think "feasible" is more of the discussion. Interesting how we learned during the 08 financial crisis that everything is correlated in a crash... I think there are similarities to the cloud, Black Swan fat tails if you will.