The history section of the book price index is incredibly america-biased. History of america, american natives, japan after ww2 and vietnam in the last century.
We’re an early stage blockchain startup building the next generation of decentralized financial infrastructure. Our novel architecture provides more than 10x better performance than competitors while completely avoiding any centralised party (or leader) having an edge over other participants, eradicating MEV issues and enabling more fair markets.
Backed by a16z crypto and 1kx.
Hiring: Backend Engineer (with trading systems experience), Business Development Lead, Content & Growth Strategist
Wikipedia: "Socialism is a political, social and economic philosophy encompassing a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production and democratic control or workers' self-management of enterprise".
Which is not "...characterised by government giving handouts".
I felt the english version was ambiguous so I read the original finnish version. It says that press reports that the trial is aborted earlier than planned is false, and for the time being there is no decision to extend it.
The problem is not if someone merges a PR before you push, but if someone branches off of the current tip of master, works on it, you remove that tip, and your colleague now is based on a history that doesn't exist, has to resolve your conflicts.
And Google participating in EU market is voluntary. If it doesn't like the laws or the power of the EU investigators, it can choose to take its business elsewhere.
But if at some point further decimals cannot be experimentally proven to be right, at best you can say "pi is such and such for such precision" and any definition that gives the same number up to that precision must be accordingly accepted. Otherwise you need to demonstrate an experiment that uses further precision.
But we don't do that, and that's why mathematics don't have to do with experience, they are an entirely different tool that also happens to be useful in experimental science.
At some point mathematical objects are defined with meta-mathematical definitions (axioms etc), so we can accept definitions based on those terms.
But in any case. You obviously do not believe that mathematical objects exist in the first place and it the question is ill posed based on your concept of reality and existence.
That's understandable, but the debate is about which is the right definition of existence reality etc. If you are not interested in this discussion and know the answers then you have nothing to gain from this paper or this discussion.
The concept of prime numbers and the prime numbers themselves is a different thing.
Unicorns don't exist but statements about them aren't meaningless. Fictionalism accepts the concept of mathematical entities but denies their existence in the real world.
One of the problems with the Canadian tax law, was that Canada has to remain competitive to the same-language speaking country south of its borders that has a bigger and more advanced stock exchange. It is explained in the last section of your second link.
The same problems will not be necessarily manifested if the law is applied in the US, especially if Canada has similar laws. However, the points of the first link seem to hold.
We already have regulations for things like safety, so it all depends on how seriously you think of the matter, and how well you think the government will be able to regulate it.