You can easily dismiss the numerous non-style related errors that JSLint finds because of the claim that JSLint "opinionated". And you can dismiss the numerous non-style related errors that one finds because you can claim a flaw in poster's personality.
The point being that I'm tired of reading responses that only focus on an insulting comment a poster makes in order to dismiss all valid technical criticism.
I put mootools and jquery through jslint.com and jslint found so many things it didn't like that I wonder if the cristicism is indeed valid. Will you now publicly lambast Douglas Crockford for daring to indirectly criticise these so-called frameworks?
Your post reads like an attack on a person rather than anything else. I've read tons of posts by David Mark and I've found little wrong with them technically so describe his position as extreme does not mean he is automatically wrong on everything.
Why pull things out of context and not provide a reference to the original?
You complain about the tone of his posts (someone called it snarky) and then go on to post your own snarky comments, why?
It would be useful that instead of praising one person and denegrating another, supporters of jquery, capucinno et al addressed each of the many concerns that have been raised about those libraries in a manner that can be objectively evaluate.
The point being that I'm tired of reading responses that only focus on an insulting comment a poster makes in order to dismiss all valid technical criticism.