> Consider valproic acid: For many decades, its only use was in laboratories as a "metabolically inert" solvent for organic compounds
Speaking of ”inert” solvents: > Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is the most common organic solvent used in biochemical and cellular assays during drug discovery programs.
> Despite its wide use, the effect of DMSO on several enzyme classes, which are crucial targets of the new therapeutic agents, are still unexplored.
> 1-4% (v/v) DMSO, the commonly used experimental concentrations, showed ∼37-80% inhibition of human acetylcholine-degrading enzyme, acetylcholinesterase (AChE)
(DMSO: A Mixed-Competitive Inhibitor of Human Acetylcholinesterase. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29017007/) > Me: oh, cool, they fixed so many tiny things I had bumped up against
> Some others: oh no, why are things changing
I'm not getting it. Maybe I'm reading this wrong, but to me these seem pretty obvious small issues to smooth over. > Specific qualia have a higher cortical resonance, due to overarching reinforcement over time, and they are picked out.
> The more a single stream of information is focused on, the greater degree of resonance that may occur with less endowed qualia (slow down, notice more shit due to neuro-satiation).
How did you come upon these conclusions, or this framing? I’m surprised, because what you’re saying meshes well with some details of a model for the neurophysiological basis of conscious experience I’ve been working on… and I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone else point out these exact connections before. [0]: http://conal.net/papers/push-pull-frp/
[1]: https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2169076
[2]: https://medium.com/@andrestaltz/why-i-cannot-say-frp-but-i-just-did-d5ffaa23973b
This wasn’t in the article, but I feel it makes for good background reading: “Universal Principles Justify the Existence of Concept Cells”, Scientific Reports 2020 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64466-7)