I am old school: I use an SRS (software requirements spec) doc and start with the product's description, then features, then I create a development doc place in Confluence and JIRA for development trail--just like I do at work. There is no one way--everyone works differently.
okay, i also could not help but think of the seinfeld episode where george screwed the cleaning lady in his cube. that's cube screwing, i guess lol. you are RIGHT about the light-heartedness--there needs to be humor. i do think people would LOVE to go to/contribute to a site like this. i like that your idea brings up the old adage, "That idea is so self-evident, why didn't i think of it?" That means it is a very good idea.
nice & concise article trying to explain why most socnetwrkng sites fail. my question/response is, is it as simple as creating "groups" for a site or is there a more complex, disciplined, and or structured approach to creating "groups"? I mean, a "Sexy Exhibitionsts" group might attract a lot of users but what kind of user community will that build as opposed to "Little Old Ladies Who Bake Cookies for Free"? There is a dynamic involved that i would like to try and breakdown in greater detail.
i think the idea is awesome, brother. i would say to expand what kind of content is included or else it might just be too bitter or mean-spirited of a site. i would try to create a tool, process, environment, function etc that lets people RESPOND TO and ADD TO what they already see and hear, that way they don't have to come to the site only to complain but instead they can add to a story/discussion by jumping in. create a conversation people want to jump into. only 1 person writes an article, but zillions might respond to it, right? aesthetically it is very minimalist right now so think about sites that look good to you and see what they are doing--imitaion is a good way to learn. a facebook page is plain and ugly until bells and whistles accumulate.
is it just me or is there a huge gap between the security apps that handle vulnerability assessment, penetration and intrusion, remediation et al and the bigger "security suites" usually made by bigger firms? i mean some of these apps seem as if they couldn't stop, identify, or track a 10 year old who has breached security. and most of these apps are restricted by domain, making them even less effective. please, someone smarter than me, please jump in!