worth to note that apart from the 'typical' patterns you can get some crazy results by tweaking the values. I use it in processing all the time. also it can create a simple but incredible 'cinema' style blur (the stuff you only see on movie credits) on type.
I`m using flexbox heavily on 10mill+ pw site for 2 years now. we had a lot of issues at first but after learning the quirks those faded out. nothing came up in the last 6 months.
It is scamming, at least in my book. Of course not the one you go to jail for but still scamming. What makes it even worse is the fact, that she talks about the opposite and judge people for doing the same what she did.
"As far as RWD taking twice as long to design and implement, perhaps this is just a question of experience. "
That is actualy a rather bold statement and might be true for common patterns. Scaling, (and pricing) RWD is really challenging for me when it comes to unkonwn things like this:
well... I guess they just gave it up here. I`m not saying it is impossible to implement but I have no freakin idea how to estimate a deadline for something like this. And itv is a big company, with a decent budget.
An other example is the famous bostonglobe.com. Beautiful site, working nicely too, but it has freakin ~12K lines in the css!
So plenty of blind spots all over the place, especially for small teams and individuals like me, when it comes to estimating, scaling and pricing.
I`m not talking about haxe in genereal. I have nothing against it. I`m talking about the idea of NME which is really nice but would fail in many (higher performance visuals) cases when it comes to javascript/canvas.
I`m not talking about haxe in genereal. I`m talking about the idea of NME which is really nice but would fail in many (higher performance visuals) cases when it comes to javascript/canvas.
see some extreme examples here: https://ello.co/zssz/post/9skesiflcmsycfhvkdtchw and a mold like structure here: https://www.instagram.com/p/CKxaqKFBF5c/