So let's assume that building immunity is even a possibility even though there is no evidence to support this while there exists substantial evidence to the contrary (people getting reinfected)?
Not happy to be living in the UK if that's really the plan.
All of the advice here is good but it's also convincing me that I really don't want to be working from home long term - I just need a better office environment and a shorter/more pleasant commute.
I'm not familiar with the space so my question might not be that relevant - where does OpenShift fit in all of this (I still struggle to differentiate it from Kubernetes) and is there any merit to IBM trying to sell it so hard?
Maybe I'm biased but I much prefer the way the UK has handled this. Card payments are everywhere, contactless payments are everywhere (life changer in London's public transport where touching in and out with your phone/card automatically charges you the correct price meaning that you don't need to deal with tickets) and everyone still has the option to use cash.
> That they may be. But that doesn't give them the authority to think "I know better than every one else in my country/world how this wealth should be spent."
Owning the wealth gives them authority on how it's spent.
I'm really not a fan of the rising trend to attack billionaires just because they're billionares. There are plenty of points that each of the mentioned individuals can be legitimately criticised on. Their level of wealth or the decision to donate it to one cause or another is not a valid point of criticism.
> Given that a person’s gender cannot be inferred by appearance, we have decided to remove these labels in order to align with the Artificial Intelligence Principles at Google, specifically Principle #2: Avoid creating or reinforcing unfair bias.
Isn't this just outright wrong? A person's gender can be inferred by appearance, and with extremely high accuracy at that.
Also, opening their front page at the same time from different browsers can show completely different discount levels. And those will be different still from the prices that you see when you log into your account.
Depends on his position relative to yours. If he's the reviewer, only leaving thumbs down on a PR means that he's not doing his job properly. If he isn't the reviewer, you can just ignore him. When he tells you that your decisions don't make sense - if it's something that you're discussing, consider that he might be right and get in more depth on why your decisions might not make sense, especially if this person is more senior. If it's just a peer who's throwing around negative one-liners - just ignore him. If it's someone that you're supposed to learn from / be managed by - then they suck at their job.
Either way, don't quit because of this. It's far from what I would label "toxic" and it's likely that you'll meet people like this in most places so you're better off learning how to handle them early on.
Not happy to be living in the UK if that's really the plan.