Cracking JXcore Again(markhaase.com)
markhaase.com
Cracking JXcore Again
http://markhaase.com/2015/06/25/cracking-jxcore-again/
12 comments
Is there anything to the JXcore project? I was at one meetup where (I think) a core member gave a presentation on it that seemed loaded with inaccuracies about Node and mobile development, and it sounded all quite suspect. Then I went to their GitHub and and was unimpressed by it as well. I haven't found anything about it that doesn't look pretty sketchy. Anyone more familiar with it who can chime in?
tl;dr They take the original JXcore binary and append your compressed source code (as base64 in a JSON structure).
I had at least hoped that (a) they didn't need the base64 overhead and (b) used uglify to minify/obfuscate the code.
tl;dr^2 It's nice for deploying JS apps, the 'Protected JavaScript Source' claim is bullshit.
I had at least hoped that (a) they didn't need the base64 overhead and (b) used uglify to minify/obfuscate the code.
tl;dr^2 It's nice for deploying JS apps, the 'Protected JavaScript Source' claim is bullshit.
Since open sourcing the project, JXcore team hasn't made any claims on code protection. The project is clearly focusing on running Node on mobile devices and ease of deployment. Regrettably, the author has overlooked this.
The JXcore team has regrettably not done a great job of removing old and misleading stuff from their site.
It's not part of the website. It's an unlinked html page that is reachable thanks to google. I'm wondering, for how long Mark is going to benefit that page to keep saying "cracked" JXcore again?
This is so dumb cheap Mark! This is an open source project and everything is open in the wild while we stated several times there is no source code protection on our Github page.
Second time you are doing this the same cheap way. Congrats!
Second time you are doing this the same cheap way. Congrats!
What does that even mean? This does not sound like a very reasonable response. What is cheap about what they did? The JXcore jxp page[1] makes assurances that are clearly absurd.
[1] http://jxcore.com/jxp/
[1] http://jxcore.com/jxp/
is there any link from any of the jxcore pages to that year old page ? It even says that download Beta 2... What beta 2 is that?
https://github.com/jxcore/jxcore is the place (as you and he already knows) we publicly give out the source codes. Even a new graduate can see what's been going on. Hey.. it's visible there is nothing to crack.
https://github.com/jxcore/jxcore is the place (as you and he already knows) we publicly give out the source codes. Even a new graduate can see what's been going on. Hey.. it's visible there is nothing to crack.
...why do you still have that page at all?
[edit] It's pretty dishonest to knowingly keep a flatly misleading page like that up. It's linked to by Google if you search for stuff on JXcore security, and there are news articles that mention it, so people are likely going to come to it.
[edit] It's pretty dishonest to knowingly keep a flatly misleading page like that up. It's linked to by Google if you search for stuff on JXcore security, and there are news articles that mention it, so people are likely going to come to it.
did not even realize we have this page till today... I'm going to keep that page for Mark E. Hasse
[edit] and put a notice that there is no such a thing like protection.
BTW; What is dishonest? Claiming to cracking something open or letting us know this page has no link and old but still there and on google ?
[edit] and put a notice that there is no such a thing like protection.
BTW; What is dishonest? Claiming to cracking something open or letting us know this page has no link and old but still there and on google ?
saying that you're going to keep that page up as long as it continues to make claims about security.
(Also, I tried to move this to Twitter since I don't think a comment thread here is a great venue for continued discussion about this)
(Also, I tried to move this to Twitter since I don't think a comment thread here is a great venue for continued discussion about this)
that was surprisingly simple for such a strong wording for their obfuscation:D