Some doubts about GPL, licensing and the BQ Aquaris E4.5 Ubuntu Edition phone(mer-project.blogspot.com)
mer-project.blogspot.com
Some doubts about GPL, licensing and the BQ Aquaris E4.5 Ubuntu Edition phone
http://mer-project.blogspot.com/2015/03/some-doubts-about-gpl-licensing-and-bq.html
8 comments
This appears to actually be an issue with the kernel, which I believe is the same as the kernel in the Android version of the device. Therefore, unless I'm missing something, the title is misleading - this is actually an issue with Mediatek's Linux kernel modifications, which applies to Android, Ubuntu, and anyone else who tries to make a Linux-based phone with Mediatek hardware using Mediatek's official kernel patches.
Here's a statement from Canonical[1]; they're assessing the situation and plan to release sources next week.
[1] https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-phone/msg11543.html
PS: disclosure: I work for Canonical, albeit not on phones
[1] https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-phone/msg11543.html
PS: disclosure: I work for Canonical, albeit not on phones
This is surely more of a Mediatek/BQ issue than an Ubuntu one. Regardless, Canonical are supposed to be on the side of software Freedom, and it's on their shoulders to make Mediatek sort this out.
I was reading recently about the struggles of Fairphone to open up their hardware so that other operating systems could be installed - Sailfish, Ubuntu, Firefox etc. The impression which emerged was that the people placing hardware orders had really quite limited power to affect this kind of behaviour, unless they are a really large player. What do you think Ubuntu can do?
Mediatek is known for being "gongkai" with respect to licensing etc., as do the majority of Asian companies. A good explanation of that ecosystem is here:
http://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?p=4297
You can find datasheets, schematics, and various other bits of info on their chipsets in various Chinese sites, but if you ask MTK they'll never officially give them to you.
http://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?p=4297
You can find datasheets, schematics, and various other bits of info on their chipsets in various Chinese sites, but if you ask MTK they'll never officially give them to you.
That's fine when it's your own stuff. Here they are pirating the Linux source code, however.
This is the reason you won't buy an Ubuntu phone? Really?
Wouldn't be high on my priority list, let alone a "normal" user.
Wouldn't be high on my priority list, let alone a "normal" user.
The author of Mer is unhappy with Ubuntu and this looks more like an attack than a constructive post.
MediaTek is now contributing directly to the Linux kernel. Those header files are from 2010. It's just an issue of updating them.
MediaTek is now contributing directly to the Linux kernel. Those header files are from 2010. It's just an issue of updating them.
So where the proper ones can be found?
I'm glad the copyright appropriation will be worked on in some unspecified in-the-future release, according to a less than one hour old anonymous YC commenter, instead of being taken care of ahead of the official release.
Well that's sad, Ubuntu phone was the only good thing. Android is boring.
That is a truly awful blog layout. So much whitespace, and what appears to be around a 40 character line limit. I see the point is made once the license is pasted in a few times, but still frustrating.
For all that, the post has a valid question about how an open phone can have such messages in its source code.
For all that, the post has a valid question about how an open phone can have such messages in its source code.
I'm sorry.
"What a truly poor design". Perhaps awful was too mean.
"What a truly poor design". Perhaps awful was too mean.