Bad Design in Star Wars(blogs.amctv.com)
blogs.amctv.com
Bad Design in Star Wars
http://blogs.amctv.com/scifi-scanner/2009/08/bad-designs-in-star-wars.php
12 comments
This is getting silly, but it reminds me of,
http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2002/01/02cobra.html
http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2002/01/02cobra.html
And yet this is realistic. Wouldn't you expect a big, clumsy organization like the Empire to be inept at design? They should've outsourced. It's inefficiencies like this that keep people like Boba Fett employed.
They should've outsourced.
How do you know they didn't? Predatory consultants and contractors absolutely flourish by hanging off the underbellies of large institutions. Somewhere in the Empire, some corporation is billing $450 per replacement blaster trigger.
How do you know they didn't? Predatory consultants and contractors absolutely flourish by hanging off the underbellies of large institutions. Somewhere in the Empire, some corporation is billing $450 per replacement blaster trigger.
The building's maintenance department still hasn't fixed one of our office doors. The springs are broken, and it's a heavy glass door. It could break your hand or brain you pretty good if you're not aware that the spring is malfunctioning. It's been two months. And we're not even a gigantic corporation.
Flagged. It's humourous, but there's no real intelligence or insight here worthy of Hacker News.
How about those AT-ATs the empire used on Hoth? All you need is some rope and they fall over?
And what are aerial intercept fighters doing with harpoons?
I think they called them tow cables. Presumably, if one fighter was shot down, another could tow it back to base behind it.
Eh, no worse than the Russian Mi-24 which had a heavily armored cockpit, but the tail could be easily damaged by small arms.
People will find a way, intentionally or not, around your defensive design. True for code and military engineering alike.
People will find a way, intentionally or not, around your defensive design. True for code and military engineering alike.
At least they learned from the heavily armored helicopter whose gigantic windshield was made of non-bulletproof glass.
I was trying to find a reference for that! Any pointers?
I believe he was referring to Rambo III. :)
There was a reference to the Russian helicopters windshields not being bulletproof in Afghanistan in a sci-fi or geek-y book I read a few years ago. I haven't seen Rambo III, so I know it's not that:) Possibly a Neal Stephenson book? Not sure. Also couldn't find any facts about it online.
How weird is it that I just read this webcomic from 2003 yesterday. And it did the same joke
http://www.irregularwebcomic.net/177.html
[deleted]
Is this serious? It's a movie - you know 'make believe'
As technology, yes of course there are loads of flaws, Dr. Who's Darleks must surely be the classic though. As far as movie design and art direction goes, John Barry the Production Designer spawned an entire new genre of sci-fi style.
As technology, yes of course there are loads of flaws, Dr. Who's Darleks must surely be the classic though. As far as movie design and art direction goes, John Barry the Production Designer spawned an entire new genre of sci-fi style.
And you've never had fun poking holes in movies?
Ewoks are cheap Wookies: http://www.filmthreat.com/index.php?section=features&Id=...
Hilarious. Valid points. I'm sure he could go on and mention another 100 or even 1000 things. I love Star Wars still.
It is not true that R2-D2 can't handle stairs. You can see him walk the stairs in Episode 2.
regarding C3-PO: Remember that Anaking skywalker built this guy when he was around 12. Imo it is just realistic that C3-PO is no super-agile-perfectly-engineered battle robot, but a bit quirky
This was fantastic. Very well done and hysterical.
http://www.somethingawful.com/d/news/nardo-design-empire.php
(That may not be the original link, but it was the first result on google.)